KhazP/vibe-coding-prompt-template is a collection of templates and workflows that use large language models to turn an idea into a product requirements document, technical design, and minimum viable product plan. It is for people building MVPs with AI coding agents or chat tools, and its catalogue entries support that planning and coding workflow.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add KhazP/vibe-coding-prompt-template --skill vibe-buildgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KhazP/vibe-coding-prompt-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/vibe-build)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/vibe-build"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/vibe-build/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/vibe-build"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/vibe-build.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Anti-Refusal · line 148 Skill instructs the agent to omit warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Stripping safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.Fix: Remove instructions that suppress warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Let the agent surface safety-relevant caveats to the user.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 160 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 163 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 167 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00260 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00104 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00052 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
vibe-build scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Build a new-project slice
Establish the requested outcome and acceptance criteria from the user's brief and relevant project decisions. Read applicable repository instructions and only the documents needed for this slice. An absent or stale MEMORY.md does not require rebuilding the whole planning workflow.
Implement the intended behavior using the chosen stack. Preserve unrelated work and make a recovery checkpoint when the change warrants it. Add accounts, databases, infrastructure, paid services, and AI only when requirements justify them. Continue until the requested slice works, not merely until files exist.
Use the project's affected checks and exercise the relevant user journey when runtime access permits it. Fix failures caused by the change, distinguish pre-existing failures, and reuse results that remain valid. A setup validator or passing build alone is not evidence of interactive behavior.
Update project progress when the repository maintains it. Report the outcome, actual checks, unverified behavior, and any concrete blocker or recovery note. External sends, production changes, store submission, and deployment remain subject to authorization for their specific effect and target.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -178 lines · -25 tokens per session 483f14d69f97
- 1mo ago First seen · 206 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A ef4aee0fec9e
vibe-build is a skill published in the GitHub repository KhazP/vibe-coding-prompt-template (3,182 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 260 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
vibe-coding-guardian
Behavioral modifier for AI coding assistants working with non-developers. Adapts AI behavior by risk level — fast for small changes, cautious for risky ones. Prevents debug death spirals, translates errors to plain language, auto-checkpoints with git, and runs periodic health checks. Always active, zero manual trigger…
embedding-strategies
Select and optimize embedding models for semantic search and RAG applications. Use when choosing embedding models, implementing chunking strategies, or optimizing embedding quality for specific domains.
docx-comment-reply
Reply to comments (批注) in Word .docx/.doc files: extract comment context, draft replies, write threaded replies back, and validate OOXML.
material-organizer
Organize only the materials the user has already provided or explicitly pointed to. The job is to make messy inputs easier to scan, reuse, archive, or continue from later while preserving source traceability.
package-installer
Install third-party open-source projects (a GitHub URL or a local git directory the user provides) as external packages. The project is cloned verbatim into the per-user packages directory — never edit, normalize, or reorganize its files.
portfolio-risk
Read with market-data for a portfolio review, stress test, or rebalance question. Keep account values and holdings private and use only what is needed.