Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/kijun0708/llm-router-mcp/code-reviewnpx skills add Kijun0708/llm-router-mcp --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kijun0708/llm-router-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kijun0708/llm-router-mcp/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kijun0708/llm-router-mcp/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kijun0708/llm-router-mcp/code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00267 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00133 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 31 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 232c814f549d
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Kijun0708/llm-router-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 11d ago), with no licence file. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 267 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
fresh-eyes-review
This skill should be used as a mandatory final sanity check before git commit, PR creation, or declaring work done. Triggers on "commit", "push", "PR", "pull request", "done", "finished", "complete", "ship", "deploy", "ready to merge". Catches security vulnerabilities, logic errors, and business rule bugs that slip…
quality-gate
Orchestrates the QUALITY pipeline stage for egregore work items, running code review, unbloat, and test updates. Use when running quality checks before a PR.
plugin-review
Review plugin quality with tiered checks and dependency scoping. Use for PR and pre-release audits.
plugin-quality
审查和改进 Zhin.js 插件质量（Plugin Runtime）。Use when asked to review plugin code, audit structure, or improve before publishing. 检查 definePlugin、约定目录、发送链与安全。.
fin-review-loop
经济金融论文的对抗性review循环。对草稿进行多轮严格评审，检查实证严谨性、方法正确性、理论贡献和写作质量，给出可操作的修改建议。（AI review 不能替代同行评审，草稿必须经研究者核实后投稿。）.
military-discipline
严格执行，质量把关，拒绝敷衍.