Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/kingdomseed/structured-workflow/construct-a-logical-plannpx skills add kingdomseed/structured-workflow --skill construct-a-logical-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kingdomseed/structured-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kingdomseed/structured-workflow/construct-a-logical-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kingdomseed/structured-workflow/construct-a-logical-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kingdomseed/structured-workflow/construct-a-logical-plan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00681 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00341 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00136 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
construct-a-logical-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 51 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 441f067671ad
construct-a-logical-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository kingdomseed/structured-workflow (12 stars, last pushed 4d ago), with no licence file. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 681 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-issue
Review an incoming external issue (and any gated-closed PR behind it) and decide whether to assign the contributor or decline. Use when the maintainer says "look at this issue", "review issue.
review-pr
Monitor and respond to automated PR reviews (Codex bot). Use when pushing a PR, checking review status, or responding to bot feedback. Handles the full cycle of push -> wait for review -> evaluate comments -> fix -> re-push.
fastmcp-client-cli
Query and invoke tools on MCP servers using fastmcp list and fastmcp call. Use when you need to discover what tools a server offers, call tools, or integrate MCP servers into workflows.
reviewing-code
Review code for quality, maintainability, and correctness. Use when reviewing pull requests, evaluating code changes, or providing feedback on implementations. Focuses on API design, patterns, and actionable feedback.
review-security-report
Review FastMCP vulnerability reports before accepting, rejecting, patching, scoring, or publishing them. Use for security advisories, bug-bounty submissions, OAuth or MCP vulnerability claims, and proposed security fixes.
butterbase
AI-native, open-source backend-as-a-service with a built-in Model Context Protocol server. Postgres, auth, storage, functions, AI gateway.