Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kirich1409/krozov-ai-tools --skill dependency-vulnerabilitiesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kirich1409/krozov-ai-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kirich1409/krozov-ai-tools/dependency-vulnerabilities)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kirich1409/krozov-ai-tools/dependency-vulnerabilities"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kirich1409/krozov-ai-tools/dependency-vulnerabilities/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kirich1409/krozov-ai-tools/dependency-vulnerabilities"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kirich1409/krozov-ai-tools/dependency-vulnerabilities.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 55 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 56 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00112 | $0.00705 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.00352 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
dependency-vulnerabilities scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dependency Vulnerabilities
Check specific, already-known Maven coordinates (groupId:artifactId:version) for known CVE/GHSA advisories via OSV.dev — for artifacts the user names directly, not a project scan.
Steps
-
Parse
groupId,artifactId,versionfor each dependency named by the user. -
Call
get_dependency_vulnerabilitieswith:dependencies:[{groupId, artifactId, version}, ...](capped at 100 items)- optional
projectPath— improves Gradle plugin-marker resolution (a marker coordinate like{id}:{id}.gradle.pluginis resolved to its real implementation GAV before querying OSV, since OSV indexes the implementation, not the marker)
-
Present per-dependency findings:
id,severity,summary,fixedVersion. Sort CRITICAL → HIGH → MEDIUM → LOW → unknown. Link advisories ashttps://osv.dev/vulnerability/{id}.malicious: trueon any finding is a distinct, stronger signal than a CVE severity (OSSF Malicious Packages convention) — call it out separately and first; recommend removing the dependency rather than just tracking the CVE.When findings exist, the tool also returns a per-dependency
safeUpgrade— a synthesized minimum version clearing every known CVE, computed from the samefixedVersiondata (ADVISORY ONLY, never a guaranteed-safe pin). PresentsafeUpgrade.versionas the suggested target whenfixesAllKnown: true; when it isfalse, say a version fixing every known issue is not yet known and surfacereason.
No findings: say so plainly.
Disclaimer (always mention once): OSV does not cover shaded/uber JARs — a dependency bundled inside a fat JAR may carry CVEs this check will not surface.
Constraints and non-goals
- Not for "are my project's dependencies vulnerable" with no specific coordinates in hand —
use
/check-deps-vulnerabilities, which resolves the project viagradlewfirst.
Fallback (MCP unavailable only)
POST the coordinates to https://api.osv.dev/v1/querybatch, then hydrate each unique
returned id with GET https://api.osv.dev/v1/vulns/{id} before reporting
severity/summary/fixedVersion — the bare querybatch response ({id, modified} only) is not
enough to report severity. Note that Gradle plugin-marker resolution is skipped on this
path.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 60 lines · 112 tokens per session scan A 4b65650a9006
dependency-vulnerabilities is a skill published in the GitHub repository kirich1409/krozov-ai-tools (22 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 112 tokens to every session and 705 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…