Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kirilxd/swe-interview-coach --skill coding-frameworksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kirilxd/swe-interview-coachWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kirilxd/swe-interview-coach/coding-frameworks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kirilxd/swe-interview-coach/coding-frameworks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kirilxd/swe-interview-coach/coding-frameworks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kirilxd/swe-interview-coach/coding-frameworks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kirilxd/swe-interview-coach/coding-frameworks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00103 | $0.06863 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00041 | $0.02745 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.01373 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00686 |
Grade A, and why
coding-frameworks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 426 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Coding Frameworks
UMPIRE method
The default scaffold for a 35-45 minute algorithmic question — the coding analog of RESHADED. Six phases, run top to bottom: Understand, Match, Plan, Implement, Review, Evaluate. The signal an interviewer scores is the process, not just a passing solution — narrate every phase transition out loud. The single most common failure is jumping straight to Implement; the first three phases are where senior signal lives.
Understand
- Restate the problem in your own words and get the interviewer to confirm before touching the keyboard.
- Ask the constraint questions that change the algorithm: input size (
nup to 10? 10^5? 10^9?), value ranges (negatives? overflow?), duplicates, empty/single-element input, sorted-ness, and the return shape (index vs value, in-place vs new, all answers vs one). Then work one tiny example by hand so you and the interviewer share the same notion of "correct".
Weak: "Two-sum, got it — I'll loop and check pairs." (Never asked sorted-ness, duplicates, or indices-vs-values.)
Strong: "Restating: return the indices of the two numbers summing to target. Exactly one solution? Negatives or duplicates? Is n up to 10^5? Can I reuse an element? Good — indices, one solution, unsorted, no reuse."
Match
- Name the pattern this problem resembles before designing anything: "pair summing to a target in a sorted array → two-pointers"; "longest window under a constraint → sliding-window". Recognition is mostly pattern-matching on input shape and asked-for output — say the candidate pattern aloud; being wrong out loud is cheap and invites a hint.
Weak: Silently starts writing nested loops with no name for what they're doing. Strong: "This smells like sliding-window: contiguous subarray, longest-under-a-constraint. If the window invariant doesn't hold I'll fall back to prefix-sum + hashmap."
Plan
- State the approach AND its time/space complexity BEFORE writing code. This is the phase candidates skip and lose the most points on.
- Start from the brute force, name its cost, then state the optimization and its cost — "brute force is O(n²); with a hashmap I get O(n) time, O(n) space". Sketch the data structures and the core loop in words; get a nod before implementing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 426 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A 1b144e3035f7
coding-frameworks is a skill published in the GitHub repository kirilxd/swe-interview-coach (91 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 6,863 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
bq-skill
A coaching workflow for building a reusable library of truthful stories for behavioral job interviews. It uses structures such as STAR—Situation, Task, Action, Result—and can connect stories to a job description and résumé.
learning-and-development
Builds capability — skills gaps, career frameworks, training that transfers to the job, and internal mobility. Use this to design a career ladder, close a capability gap, decide whether to build or hire a skill, structure onboarding into a role, or work out why training keeps failing to change anything.
elixir-idioms
OTP/BEAM patterns and Elixir idioms — GenServer, Supervisor, Task, Registry, pattern matching, with chains, pipes. Use when designing processes or debugging BEAM issues.
onboarding-express
AI-guided architectural tour of any codebase — entry points, business logic, and the most complex module in one structured pass, powered by Graph-It-Live. Use this skill whenever someone is new to a codebase or wants a quick orientation. Trigger for: "I just joined this team", "explain this repo to me", "give me a…
teach-me
Teach the learner to deeply understand a body of work — the current session's changes, a PR, an ADR, or any topic they name — the problem and why it existed, the solution and why it was built that way, and why it matters, incrementally and confirming mastery at each stage before advancing. Use when the user wants to…
creating-explainers
Use when creating an interactive explainer - a single self-contained HTML page with hand-built Canvas figures. Handles source-file explainers, topic-driven research explainers, and mixed intake where files provide the spine and research adds support. Trigger phrases include "make an explainer", "turn this paper into…