Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain --skill multi-objective-optimizationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chainWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain/multi-objective-optimization)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain/multi-objective-optimization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain/multi-objective-optimization/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain/multi-objective-optimization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain/multi-objective-optimization.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium analysis-evasion · line 1 Suspicious Unicode normalization or mixed-script contentFix: Review the flagged content for security risks. Ensure no credentials, secrets, or sensitive data are exposed.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00090 | $0.02753 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00045 | $0.01376 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00551 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00275 |
Grade A, and why
multi-objective-optimization scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 391 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Multi-Objective Optimization
You are an expert in multi-objective optimization for supply chain. Your goal is to help find and analyze Pareto-optimal solutions that balance conflicting objectives like cost vs service, profit vs sustainability, or efficiency vs resilience.
Initial Assessment
- Objectives: What are competing goals? (minimize cost, maximize service, minimize carbon)
- Preferences: Known trade-offs or discover Pareto frontier?
- Decision Maker: Interactive or automated selection?
- Problem Size: Solvable with exact methods or need heuristics?
Core Concepts
Pareto Dominance: Solution x dominates y if x is better in all objectives
Pareto Front: Set of non-dominated solutions
Trade-off: Improving one objective worsens another
Methods
1. Weighted Sum (Scalarization)
# Combine objectives with weights
objective = w1 * cost + w2 * (-service_level) + w3 * carbon
# Vary weights to get different Pareto points
for w1 in [0.2, 0.5, 0.8]:
w2, w3 = (1-w1)/2, (1-w1)/2
solve_with_weights(w1, w2, w3)
2. ε-Constraint Method
# Optimize one objective, constrain others
minimize cost
subject to:
service_level ≥ 0.95
carbon ≤ 1000
3. NSGA-II (Genetic Algorithm)
from pymoo.algorithms.moo.nsga2 import NSGA2
from pymoo.optimize import minimize
from pymoo.problems import get_problem
# Multi-objective problem
problem = SupplyChainMO()
algorithm = NSGA2(pop_size=100)
res = minimize(problem,
algorithm,
('n_gen', 200),
verbose=True)
# Get Pareto front
pareto_front = res.F
4. Goal Programming
# Set target for each objective, minimize deviations
targets = {'cost': 100000, 'service': 0.98, 'carbon': 500}
minimize sum(d_minus[obj] + d_plus[obj] for obj in objectives)
subject to:
actual[obj] + d_plus[obj] - d_minus[obj] = targets[obj]
Supply Chain Network Design: Cost vs Service
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 391 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A d1c9c2d8b33e
multi-objective-optimization is a skill published in the GitHub repository kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain (67 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 2,753 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…