Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add klhq/skillmux --skill code-security-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/klhq/skillmuxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/klhq/skillmux/code-security-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/klhq/skillmux/code-security-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/klhq/skillmux/code-security-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/klhq/skillmux/code-security-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/klhq/skillmux/code-security-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00095 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00038 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00019 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00010 |
Grade A, and why
code-security-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
代码安全审计
审查代码中的安全漏洞与注入风险，包括 SQL 注入、跨站脚本、不安全的反序列化和密钥泄露，并给出修复建议。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 9 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 9743c5d4cce6
code-security-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository klhq/skillmux (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 95 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-25.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Review code for quality, maintainability, and correctness.
release-pr-review
Review pass on an open release PR (release/ → main) — the step between git-wrapup and release-and-publish when a project releases in gated release PR mode. Reads the PR's commit range through the code-simplifier lens plus a correctness review, verifies whatever an automated reviewer left on the PR, lands fixes as…
code-simplifier
Cleanup pass that edits the working tree — over a session's uncommitted changes, or a named path or whole codebase. Reads git diff (or the named target) and simplifies, consolidates, and aligns code with the existing codebase — modernize syntax, cut unnecessary complexity and slop, consolidate duplicated logic, catch…
code-review
Reviews a supplied code path or diff for correctness, security, maintainability, and style without executing or modifying it.
github-commenting
How to post clean, rich, deduplicated GitHub PR review comments — suggestion blocks, multi-line anchors, markers, formatting rules. Load before posting or fixing any PR comment.
code-review
Review ServiceNow server-side scripts for ES5 violations, ACL/injection/XSS issues, N+1 queries, missing setLimit/error handling, hard-coded sysids, and business-rule recursion risks.