Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Kokxi/qa-test-skills --skill qa-specialized-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kokxi/qa-test-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kokxi/qa-test-skills/qa-specialized-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kokxi/qa-test-skills/qa-specialized-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kokxi/qa-test-skills/qa-specialized-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kokxi/qa-test-skills/qa-specialized-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kokxi/qa-test-skills/qa-specialized-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00117 | $0.03128 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.01564 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00626 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00313 |
Grade A, and why
qa-specialized-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 303 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
专项测试能力
核心原则
专项测试不只是会用工具,而是知道测什么、怎么测、测到什么程度算够。
深度要求(参考值)
关键指标:根据系统复杂度调整专项测试深度
| 复杂度 | 维度覆盖要求 | 每维度测试点 | 说明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 简单系统 | 至少2个维度 | 5-8个/维度 | 内部系统/低风险 |
| 中等系统 | 全部3个维度 | 10-15个/维度 | 业务系统/中等风险 |
| 复杂系统 | 全部3个维度+深度测试 | 20-30个/维度 | 核心系统/高风险 |
适用范围:本技能仅在你明确要求某个专项测试方向(如性能/安全/兼容性)且已确认测试目标和环境授权时激活。安全测试相关内容必须配合授权声明使用,不得在未获授权的系统上执行。
维度1:性能测试
性能测试类型
├─ 负载测试(Load Testing)
│ ├─ 目标:验证系统在预期负载下的表现
│ ├─ 方法:逐步增加并发,观察性能指标
│ └─ 指标:响应时间、吞吐量、错误率
│
├─ 压力测试(Stress Testing)
│ ├─ 目标:验证系统在极限负载下的表现
│ ├─ 方法:持续增加并发直到系统崩溃
│ └─ 指标:系统极限、崩溃点、恢复能力
│
├─ 稳定性测试(Soak Testing)
│ ├─ 目标:验证系统长时间运行的稳定性
│ ├─ 方法:持续运行24-72小时
│ └─ 指标:内存泄漏、资源消耗、性能退化
│
└─ 尖峰测试(Spike Testing)
├─ 目标:验证系统应对突发流量的能力
├─ 方法:突然增加并发
└─ 指标:系统响应、恢复时间、数据一致性
性能指标
核心指标:
├─ 响应时间(Response Time)
│ ├─ P50:50%请求的响应时间
│ ├─ P95:95%请求的响应时间
│ ├─ P99:99%请求的响应时间
│ └─ 目标:P99 < 1秒
│
├─ 吞吐量(Throughput)
│ ├─ TPS:每秒事务数
│ ├─ QPS:每秒查询数
│ └─ 目标:根据业务定义
│
├─ 错误率(Error Rate)
│ ├─ 计算:错误请求数 / 总请求数
│ └─ 目标:< 0.1%
│
└─ 资源使用率
├─ CPU使用率:< 80%
├─ 内存使用率:< 80%
├─ 磁盘IO:< 80%
└─ 网络IO:< 80%
性能测试工具
├─ JMeter
│ ├─ 优点:功能全面、插件丰富
│ ├─ 缺点:界面复杂、资源消耗大
│ └─ 适用:复杂场景、协议测试
│
├─ Locust
│ ├─ 优点:代码化、分布式
│ ├─ 缺点:需要编程能力
│ └─ 适用:API测试、分布式测试
│
├─ k6
│ ├─ 优点:现代化、CI友好
│ ├─ 缺点:社区较小
│ └─ 适用:现代应用、DevOps
│
└─ wrk
├─ 优点:轻量、高效
├─ 缺点:功能简单
└─ 适用:简单压测、快速验证
维度2:安全测试
⚠️ 授权与法律声明:安全测试(尤其是渗透测试)必须获得系统所有者的明确书面授权。 执行前必须确认:
- 测试目标属于你或已获得明确授权
- 清楚界定测试范围、目标环境和边界(严禁超出授权范围)
- 了解并遵守当地网络安全相关法律法规
- 测试活动不会对业务系统造成影响(建议使用独立测试环境)
- 使用攻击性工具(Burp Suite/SQLMap 等)仅限于你拥有或明确获授权的系统
安全测试类型
├─ OWASP Top 10
│ ├─ 注入攻击(Injection)
│ ├─ 失效的身份认证(Broken Authentication)
│ ├─ 敏感数据暴露(Sensitive Data Exposure)
│ ├─ XML外部实体(XXE)
│ ├─ 失效的访问控制(Broken Access Control)
│ ├─ 安全配置错误(Security Misconfiguration)
│ ├─ 跨站脚本(XSS)
│ ├─ 不安全的反序列化(Insecure Deserialization)
│ ├─ 使用含有已知漏洞的组件(Vulnerable Components)
│ └─ 不足的日志和监控(Insufficient Logging)
│
├─ 渗透测试
│ ├─ 信息收集:域名、IP、端口
│ ├─ 漏洞扫描:自动化扫描
│ ├─ 漏洞利用:手动验证
│ └─ 报告输出:漏洞报告
│
└─ 代码审计
├─ 静态分析:代码扫描
├─ 动态分析:运行时检测
└─ 人工审计:代码Review
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed 78bab094abe3
- 9d ago First seen · 303 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A e4c4d703930f
qa-specialized-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository Kokxi/qa-test-skills (24 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 117 tokens to every session and 3,128 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-harness-fault-injection
Use when an agent workflow needs deterministic recovery evidence for sandbox, MCP/tool, worker, checkpoint, memory, or orchestration failures.
octocode-benchmark
Use when planning, running, grading, or reporting the by-hand Octocode research benchmark — pairwise matchups (Octocode anchor vs one baseline: gh+RTK, gh+Headroom, or plain gh) over markdown questions, with a fresh isolated runner agent per (question, arm, pass), one blind judge per question grading two answers X/Y…
octocode-graph-eval
Use when you need a measurable keep/discard loop — goal→KPI, baseline vs target, held-out checks, eval suites, or don't-stop-till-done against a runnable sensor. Not for ordinary ship checks where 'tests passed' is enough.
plugin-test
A testing guide for Zhin.js plugins using Vitest, a JavaScript and TypeScript testing framework. It focuses on checking command and tool behavior, ordinary business logic, and the plugin package’s required structure.
modernize-test-starter
Modernize QUnit unit tests and OPA5 integration tests to the UI5 Test Starter concept. Use this skill when: The linter reports prefer-test-starter for .qunit.html or .qunit.js files Test HTML files use manual sap-ui-core.js bootstrapping instead of Test Starter's runTest.js/createSuite.js Test JS files use…
javascript-development
JavaScript/TypeScript ES2024+, async/await, DOM manipulation, Node.js, and API integration. Use when writing vanilla JS/TS code, working with REST/fetch APIs, implementing frontend logic, or configuring JS build tools.