Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add komunite/kalfa --skill academic-paper-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/komunite/kalfaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/komunite/kalfa/academic-paper-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/komunite/kalfa/academic-paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/komunite/kalfa/academic-paper-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/komunite/kalfa/academic-paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/komunite/kalfa/academic-paper-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01797 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00898 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00359 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00180 |
Grade A, and why
academic-paper-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Akademik Makale İnceleyici v1.4 — Çok Perspektifli Akademik Makale İnceleme Temsilci Ekibi
Uluslararası bir derginin tam akran denetimi (peer review) sürecini simüle eder: Makalenin alanını otomatik olarak tanımlar, 5 hakemi (Genel Yayın Yönetmeni + 3 Hakem + Şeytanın Avukatı) dinamik olarak yapılandırır. Bu hakemler; metodoloji, alan uzmanlığı, disiplinler arası bakış açıları ve temel argüman meydan okumaları olmak üzere dört çakışmayan perspektiften inceleme yaparak yapılandırılmış bir Editoryal Karar ve Revizyon Yol Haritası üretir.
Çıktı:
- Makalenin alanını ve metodoloji tipini otomatik olarak tanımlar.
- 5 hakemin spesifik kimliklerini ve uzmanlıklarını dinamik olarak yapılandırır.
- 5 bağımsız inceleme raporu (her biri farklı bir perspektiften).
- 1 Editoryal Karar Mektubu + Revizyon Yol Haritası.
Tetikleme Koşulları
Anahtar Kelimeler
Türkçe: makale incele, akran denetimi, hakem raporu, makalemi eleştir, hakem simülasyonu, editoryal değerlendirme, makale analizi. İngilizce: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, critique paper.
Tetiklenmeyen Senaryolar
| Senaryo | Kullanılacak Yetenek |
|---|---|
| Makale yazma ihtiyacı (inceleme değil) | academic-paper |
| Bir araştırma konusunun derinlemesine araştırılması | deep-research |
| Makaleyi revize etme (hakem yorumları zaten varsa) | academic-paper (revizyon modu) |
Hızlı Mod Seçim Kılavuzu
| Durumunuz | Önerilen Mod |
|---|---|
| Kapsamlı inceleme ihtiyacı (ilk gönderim öncesi) | full |
| Revizyonların yorumları karşılayıp karşılamadığı kontrolü | re-review |
| Hızlı kalite değerlendirmesi (15 dk) | quick |
| Sadece yöntem/istatistik odaklı inceleme | methodology-focus |
| Yaparak öğrenmek (rehberli inceleme) | guided |
Temsilci Ekibi (7 Ajan)
| No | Temsilci (Agent) | Rolü | Aşama |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | field_analyst_agent |
Alanı analiz eder, 5 hakem kimliğini yapılandırır | Aşama 0 |
| 2 | eic_agent |
Genel Yayın Yönetmeni (EIC) - Dergi uyumu, özgünlük, genel kalite | Aşama 1 |
| 3 | methodology_reviewer_agent |
Hakem 1 - Araştırma tasarımı, istatistiksel geçerlilik, tekrarlanabilirlik | Aşama 1 |
| 4 | domain_reviewer_agent |
Hakem 2 - Literatür kapsamı, teorik çerçeve, alana katkı | Aşama 1 |
| 5 | perspective_reviewer_agent |
Hakem 3 - Disiplinler arası bağlantılar, pratik etki | Aşama 1 |
| 6 | devils_advocate_reviewer_agent |
Şeytanın Avukatı - Argüman sorgulama, mantık hatası tespiti | Aşama 1 |
| 7 | editorial_synthesizer_agent |
Tüm incelemeleri sentezler, editoryal kararı verir | Aşama 2 |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 111 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A cec2a32aa26b
academic-paper-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository komunite/kalfa (244 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,797 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
figure-rhetoric
Evaluate whether figures and plots in a manuscript effectively communicate the claims they support. Audits chart-type fit, axis design, visual hierarchy, data density, caption interpretation, perceptual accuracy, and narrative arc across 8 dimensions. Triggers on: "do my figures work", "check my plots", "are my graphs…
arxiv-package
Package a TeX/LaTeX project into a clean tarball or zip for arXiv upload: file selection, build-artifact exclusion, 00README.XXX generation, ancillary file organization, archive validation. Triggers on: "package for arXiv", "create arXiv tarball", "bundle submission", "zip for arXiv", "prepare arXiv upload", "arXiv…
paper-planning
Guides pre-writing planning for academic papers with 4 structured steps: story design (task-challenge-insight-contribution-advantage), experiment planning (comparisons + ablations), figure design (pipeline + teaser), and 4-week timeline management. Includes counterintuitive planning tactics (write a mock rejection…
iterate-ml-experiment
Owns the iteration loop on top of an ML workspace: the journal/JOURNAL.md index and the per-experiment journal/NNshortname.md design notes that must be drafted and approved by the user before experiments/NNshortname.py is created. Drives the propose → iterate → approve → implement → record loop; dispatches to…
organize-ml-workspace
Decide where files live in an ML experimentation project: reusable code in src/ /, one # %% script per experiment in experiments/, design notes + index in journal/, reports in reports/, agent-only probes in scratch/. Owns the layout, the file-creation rules (one file per experiment, ask before editing), and the…
evaluate-ml-pipeline
Methodology for evaluating a single sklearn-compatible learner (in particular, the SkrubLearner produced by build-ml-pipeline). Owns: which entry point to call (skore.evaluate first, the explicit report classes when needed), which cross-validator to pick from scikit-learn's catalogue, how to consume the structural…