Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kopp0510/claude-dd --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kopp0510/claude-ddWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kopp0510/claude-dd/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kopp0510/claude-dd/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kopp0510/claude-dd/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.00425 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00212 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00085 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review
綜合程式碼審查 Skill，透過調用 workflow-review 命令執行包含安全、效能、配置安全的多維度審查。
Skill 定位
這是 workflow-review:review 命令的包裝器 (Wrapper)
- 實作方式：透過
Skill(skill="workflow-review:review")調用 - Skill 職責：提供自動觸發、需求確認、結構化報告產出
- 命令職責：執行實際的多維度程式碼審查
工作流程
Stage 1: 需求確認
詢問使用者要審查的範圍和重點。
Stage 2: 調用 Skill 命令
Skill(skill="workflow-review:review")
Stage 3: 結果報告
整理命令輸出，產出結構化審查報告。
與 code-reviewer 的差異
| 特性 | review | code-reviewer |
|---|---|---|
| 審查範圍 | 多維度（安全+效能+配置） | 程式碼品質為主 |
| 調用方式 | Skill 命令 | Agent subagent |
| 適用場景 | 合併前全面審查 | 日常 PR 審查 |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 39 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A d53484e3e073
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository kopp0510/claude-dd (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 425 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
security-review
Perform a focused security review of pending git changes to identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities with real exploitation potential. Use this skill when the user asks for a security review, security audit, vulnerability scan, or wants to check pending changes on a branch for security issues before merging.…
huggingface-llm-trainer
Train or fine-tune language models with TRL or Unsloth on Hugging Face Jobs, including SFT, DPO, GRPO, reward models, and GGUF conversion. Use for cloud LLM training; use huggingface-vision-trainer for vision tasks.
feature-dev
Guide a feature implementation through a structured seven-phase workflow with deep codebase understanding, clarifying questions, parallel architecture design, and quality review. Use this skill when the user asks to build a new feature, add functionality, or wants a methodical approach to implementation rather than…
review
Validate plans, execution, or PRs against wish criteria — returns SHIP / FIX-FIRST / BLOCKED with severity-tagged gaps.
reply-to-pr-threads
Draft, confirm, and post replies to GitHub PR review threads. Handles per-category reply formatting, re-fetches thread resolution state so auto-resolved threads are skipped, and posts via GraphQL. Use when the user asks to "reply to PR threads", "post PR thread replies", or "draft PR reply messages".