Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kopp0510/claude-dd --skill task-plannergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kopp0510/claude-ddWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kopp0510/claude-dd/task-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kopp0510/claude-dd/task-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kopp0510/claude-dd/task-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kopp0510/claude-dd/task-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kopp0510/claude-dd/task-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00176 | $0.03730 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00070 | $0.01492 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.00746 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00373 |
Grade A, and why
task-planner scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- 用其他方式驗(lint、tsc、curl 打真實 API、開頁面看):只用這種時,寫出為什麼比寫測試合適(例如前端沒有測試框架、行為零改動) How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 133 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Task Planner — 功能段落規劃
把一件要跨好幾輪 8 步開發迴圈的工作,拆成段落(S1、S2…)與段落裡的小任務(S2-1、S2-2…),
進度表寫進設計文件。換 session、/compact 之後,照表就知道做到哪、下一段是哪段。
段落與小任務
| 層 | 做法 | 完成條件 |
|---|---|---|
小任務 S2-1 |
實作、驗證、commit(迴圈的步驟 1、2) | 驗證通過且已 commit |
段落 S2 |
小任務全部完成後,整段跑一次步驟 3–8 | 步驟 3–8 全部跑完,才標 DONE |
小任務 commit 了,只代表那個小任務完成;段落還差整段的步驟 3–8。
S2 租金產生
├── S2-1 DB schema:實作、驗證、commit
├── S2-2 service:實作、驗證、commit
└── S2-3 API:實作、驗證、commit
↓ 小任務全部 commit 完
S2 整段跑步驟 3–8
↓
S2 = DONE
步驟
1. 讀來源
依序找,存在的才讀:
- 使用者指定的設計文件(
docs/designs/*.md,design-brainstorm 的產物) - issue、規格或使用者口頭描述
相關的既有程式碼、目錄結構、git 歷史自己查。
完成條件:列出「要做的項目」清單——口頭需求逐句拆開、設計文件逐個模組/端點/元件,加上會被改到的既有程式。
2. 切段落
- 段落照功能切:一段做完一個步驟 5 驗得到的功能(打得到的 API、點得到的頁面、跑得出結果的指令)
- 高風險工作不跟其他功能混在同一段,讓 review 專心看它:產生帳款、改帳款狀態、金額計算、改變權限規則、批次或排程刪除資料。 一般的新增修改(例如表單存月租金)、沿用既有的權限檢查、有外鍵擋著的單筆刪除,照功能放在一起。 高風險工作單獨驗不到時,只帶上讓它驗得到的最少工作一起成段
- 被依賴的段落排前面,依賴只標在段落層級;表格由上往下就是執行順序
完成條件:清單每一項都放進了某一段;每段都寫得出「步驟 5 要看到什麼」;依賴沒有繞圈,第一段沒有依賴。 只切出 1 段就不往下走:告訴使用者一圈做得完、不用拆,照一般的 8 步迴圈做(沒有 task 工具時照全域 §4.4 記進度)。
3. 列小任務
每段拆成小任務,編號 S<段>-<序>,被依賴的先做(例如資料模型、服務、API 或排程、前端依序)。
一個小任務的大小以「一次 commit 看得懂」為準(一個 migration、一個服務、一種資源的 API、一個頁面),
而且要能照專案的驗法單獨驗過;單獨驗不過的(例如專案不承認只跑單元測試),跟用到它的那層併成一個。每個小任務寫:
- 動詞開頭的名稱、要動的檔案路徑、commit 訊息(第一行結尾帶編號,例如
feat: 新增租金產生(S2-1)) - 驗證方式,至少寫一種;專案規定兩種都要,就兩種都寫:
- 用測試驗:先寫會失敗的測試,寫明測試檔、測什麼、跑哪個指令
- 用其他方式驗(lint、tsc、curl 打真實 API、開頁面看):只用這種時,寫出為什麼比寫測試合適(例如前端沒有測試框架、行為零改動)
設計細節用章節名(或表格那一列)指回原文,不重抄;來源是口頭描述的,細節寫進「假設」。 開工前得先查清楚的事(外部 API 文件、舊實作的算法),寫成該段的「開工前提」,不列成小任務。
完成條件:每個小任務都有檔案路徑、驗證方式、commit 訊息;所有要新增的測試整理成一份清單。
4. 給使用者批准
在對話裡列出:進度表草稿、每段的小任務、要新增的測試清單、假設。
專案裡已經在記進度的地方也列出來,說明打算怎麼換:舊的段落表、「進度以…為準」的句子、專案狀態檔(例如記著目前做到哪的 PROJECT_STATE.md)、CLAUDE.md 開頭的進度欄(例如 **進度**: 段落 1–11 完成),以及描述這些紀錄用途的句子。
用 AskUserQuestion 問(一次最多 4 題):
- 決策題:換個答案,段落、範圍、對外介面(API 形狀、畫面)或舊紀錄的換法就會不同的;還有碰到步驟 2 那些高風險工作、來源又有兩種讀法的(例如月中入住的第一個月按日還是整月算)。每題附建議答案,其他假設列在草稿裡,跟批准題一起批
- 批准題:「批准:寫進設計文件並 commit」或「要修改」
決策題超過 3 題就分批問,批准題放在最後一批。決策題選了非建議答案,同一批選的批准不算:回步驟 2 重出草稿,再問一次批准。 使用者批准的測試清單,就是使用者要求加的測試(全域 §3.5:不主動新增測試,使用者要求時例外)。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +6 lines 527f1b360742
- 1mo ago Changed · +61 lines · +63 tokens per session ae718ecf1035
- 1mo ago Changed · +55 tokens per session f83b38b4122c
- 1mo ago Changed 402582ae1b87
- 1mo ago Changed 641f81ce1aa2
- 1mo ago First seen · 66 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 7115025a7fb6
task-planner is a skill published in the GitHub repository kopp0510/claude-dd (12 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 176 tokens to every session and 3,730 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
ring:mapping-feature-relationships
Mapping how features relate and phasing the work: categorizing PRD features, grouping them into domains, charting cross-feature journeys, dependencies, and integration points, and defining the binding Phases that plan.md mirrors one-to-one at Gate 7. Gate 2 of ring:planning-large-features; runs after…