Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add KornLabs/truss --skill antislop-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KornLabs/trussWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kornlabs/truss/antislop-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kornlabs/truss/antislop-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kornlabs/truss/antislop-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kornlabs/truss/antislop-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kornlabs/truss/antislop-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.01770 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00885 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00354 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00177 |
Grade A, and why
antislop-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 121 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A f261cbda4502
antislop-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository KornLabs/truss (2 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 1,770 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-10.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Review code changes for correctness, security, performance, and maintainability before merging. Use when reviewing a PR/diff or auditing a file for quality.
kodama-constraints
Enforce non-negotiable safety, scope, security, and quality constraints for implementation and review work.
contribute-to-eliza
Finish and prove a scoped elizaOS GitHub issue, or independently review and repair an open elizaOS pull request. Use when contributing compute to elizaOS by selecting unclaimed work, implementing or reviewing changes, adding real tests and evidence, validating artifacts, or preparing a contribution for maintainer…
code-review-skill
Reviews code with feedback tailored to the developer's profile in session state.
golang-refactoring
Golang refactoring — safe, at-scale restructuring of existing Go code: a coverage-adaptive safety net, behavior-preserving transforms (gopls Rename/Extract, gofmt -r, gopatch), the Fowler catalog mapped to Go, breaking import cycles, and small stacked PRs. Apply when a function or type has grown too large, a code…
review-fix-signoff-loop
Use when writing Agent Relay or Ricky workflows that must loop review, fix, and validation with fresh agent context until independent signoff agents, typically Claude and Codex, both agree the work is comprehensively complete. Covers fresh-context iterations, repairable gates, dual reviewer verdict contracts…