Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kortix-ai/suna --skill access-policygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kortix-ai/sunaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kortix-ai/suna/access-policy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kortix-ai/suna/access-policy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kortix-ai/suna/access-policy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kortix-ai/suna/access-policy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kortix-ai/suna/access-policy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 61 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 126 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.01762 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00705 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00352 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00176 |
Grade A, and why
access-policy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 157 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 0b1c9ad98dd7
access-policy is a skill published in the GitHub repository kortix-ai/suna (20,314 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,762 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
azure
Microsoft Azure expert for az CLI, AKS, App Service, and cloud infrastructure.
gcp
Google Cloud Platform expert for gcloud CLI, GKE, Cloud Run, and managed services.
aws
AWS cloud services expert for EC2, S3, Lambda, IAM, and AWS CLI.
terraform
Terraform IaC expert for providers, modules, state management, and planning.
kubernetes
Kubernetes operations expert for kubectl, pods, deployments, and debugging.
remote-compute-modal
Run GPU jobs on the user's own Modal account via host.compute.create('byoc:modal', ...). Covers the create→submit→waitfornotification flow, the computeprovider kernel for env setup, image/volume resolution, and the two approval cards. Load once you've decided to dispatch to Modal.