Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kostja94/marketing-skills --skill comparison-tablegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kostja94/marketing-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kostja94/marketing-skills/comparison-table)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kostja94/marketing-skills/comparison-table"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kostja94/marketing-skills/comparison-table/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kostja94/marketing-skills/comparison-table"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kostja94/marketing-skills/comparison-table.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00177 | $0.02471 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00088 | $0.01236 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00494 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00247 |
Grade A, and why
comparison-table-generator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- comparison-table-generator — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- comparison-table-generator — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- comparison-table-generator — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 155 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Components: Comparison Table Section
Guides comparison tables as an in-page section: a scannable matrix (rows × columns) embedded inside landing pages, blog posts, pricing pages, homepages, or docs. Not a standalone page type—parent page structure, URLs, and "alternatives vs blog" decisions come from alternatives-page-generator, landing-page-generator, article-page-generator, pricing-page-generator, etc. Distinct from FAQ (Q&A → FAQPage) and from HowTo (procedure → HowTo). schema-markup remains the source for exhaustive Schema.org rules; this skill owns section-level criteria, copy, HTML/accessibility, fairness, and ad alignment.
When invoking: On first use, if helpful, open with 1–2 sentences on what this skill covers and why it matters, then provide the main output. On subsequent use or when the user asks to skip, go directly to the main output.
Comparison Table Section vs Alternatives Page
| Dimension | Comparison table section (this skill) | Alternatives / compare page |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | One block: headings, table, footnotes, optional CTA line | Full page or article: headline, intro, verdict, listicles, FAQ, metadata |
| URL / intent | Chosen by parent; section supports commercial or informational parent | Owns "X alternatives", "X vs Y", PPC landing strategy |
| PPC | Align copy and criteria with ad and parent LP | Owns where paid traffic lands (dedicated LP vs blog) |
| Skill | comparison-table-generator (this) | alternatives-page-generator |
Use both when building an alternatives LP: alternatives-page-generator for page structure; comparison-table-generator for the table itself (criteria, rows, cells, fairness).
Comparison Types (Same Component, Different Framing)
| Type | Rows / columns | Typical use |
|---|---|---|
| Product vs product | You vs 1–N competitors or tools | Alternatives LP, category pages, blog "best X" |
| Traditional vs modern | Old workflow vs your approach | Category creation, thought leadership, LP objection handling |
| Manual vs automated | Spreadsheets, agencies, DIY vs product | Mid-funnel LP, demo request pages |
| Before / after | State A vs State B (metrics allowed if true) | Outcome-focused LP, case studies |
| Feature / capability matrix | Features as rows; plans or products as columns | Pricing-adjacent, features-page-generator context |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 155 lines · 177 tokens per session scan A 374fb3b5c742
comparison-table-generator is a skill published in the GitHub repository kostja94/marketing-skills (967 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 177 tokens to every session and 2,471 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
landing-page-generator
Generates high-converting Next.js/React landing pages with Tailwind CSS. Uses PAS, AIDA, and BAB frameworks for optimized copy/components (Heroes, Features, Pricing). Focuses on Core Web Vitals/SEO.
pitch-deck-web
Build a responsive, interactive pitch-deck website from a brand book + a PRD/example deck. Use when the user asks to "build a pitch deck", "make an investor deck", "create a sales deck", generate a deck site from a brand book, or scaffold a deck from a PRD or existing slides. Pulls brand tokens (colors, typography…
SEO Content Optimizer
Analyzes and rewrites content to maximize search engine visibility without sounding robotic.
web-vitals
Measure a live page's real Core Web Vitals online via Google PageSpeed Insights (Lighthouse lab + CrUX field data) and turn the result into a prioritized, falsifiable fix list. Use when asked to "check web vitals", "run a PageSpeed / Lighthouse test", "what is the LCP/INP/CLS of this page", "is this page fast", "page…
audit-speed
Deep Core Web Vitals and page speed audit. Use when the user asks about page speed, Core Web Vitals, LCP, CLS, INP, FCP, TTFB, Lighthouse scores, why a page is slow, performance optimization, or resource size analysis. For broader technical SEO issues, see diagnose-seo.
animate
Review a feature and enhance it with purposeful animations, micro-interactions, and motion effects that improve usability and delight. Use when the user mentions adding animation, transitions, micro-interactions, motion design, hover effects, or making the UI feel more alive.