Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kucherenko/gangsta --skill exit-strategygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kucherenko/gangstaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kucherenko/gangsta/exit-strategy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kucherenko/gangsta/exit-strategy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kucherenko/gangsta/exit-strategy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kucherenko/gangsta/exit-strategy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kucherenko/gangsta/exit-strategy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 175 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.01119 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00560 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00224 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
exit-strategy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 205 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
The Exit Strategy: Finishing a Development Branch
Overview
Every operation needs a clean exit. Guide completion of development work by verifying, presenting options, executing, and cleaning up.
Core principle: Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
Announce at start: "Initiating exit strategy for this branch."
The Process
Step 1: Verify Tests
Before presenting options, verify tests pass:
# Run project's test suite
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...
If tests fail:
Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before exiting:
[Show failures]
Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.
Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.
If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.
Step 2: Determine Base Branch
# Try common base branches
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null
Or ask the Don: "This branch split from main — is that correct?"
Step 3: Present Options
Present exactly these 4 options:
Implementation complete. What's the exit strategy?
1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work
Which option?
Don't add explanation — keep options concise.
Step 4: Execute Choice
Option 1: Merge Locally
# Switch to base branch
git checkout <base-branch>
# Pull latest
git pull
# Merge feature branch
git merge <feature-branch>
# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>
# If tests pass
git branch -d <feature-branch>
Then: Cleanup safehouse (Step 5)
Option 2: Push and Create PR
# Push branch
git push -u origin <feature-branch>
# Create PR
gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<2-3 bullets of what changed>
## Test Plan
- [ ] <verification steps>
EOF
)"
Then: Report PR URL to the Don. Preserve safehouse.
Option 3: Keep As-Is
Report: "Keeping branch . Safehouse preserved at ."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 205 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A c54cacc02e21
exit-strategy is a skill published in the GitHub repository kucherenko/gangsta (81 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,119 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ship
Enter the Ship phase of CocoBrew. Reads review.md approval, generates structured commit, creates semantic version tag, optionally creates PR via gh CLI, and records deployment details. Requires approved review.
apply-semantic-versioning
Apply semantic versioning (SemVer 2.0.0) to determine the correct version bump based on change analysis. Covers major/minor/patch classification, pre-release identifiers, build metadata, and breaking change detection. Use when preparing a new release to determine the correct version number, after merging changes…
create-github-release
Create a GitHub release with proper tagging, release notes, and optional build artifacts. Covers semantic versioning, changelog generation, and GitHub CLI usage. Use when marking a stable version of software for distribution, publishing a new library or application version, creating release notes for stakeholders, or…
project-release-maintainer
Project overlay for release and packaging maintenance across install layout, shipped assets, automation, license and notice alignment, and release docs. Not for content-only documentation or publishing without explicit authorization.
release-skills
A release workflow for preparing and publishing a new software version.
agent-framework-py-release
Use when cutting a Python release for the microsoft/agent-framework monorepo. Triggers on "bump py versions", "cut a python release", "prepare release PR for python", "release py packages", "bump python to X.Y.Z", or similar requests to bump Python package versions and prepare a release PR. Handles all four lifecycle…