Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kylin985ti/china-accounting-skills --skill materialitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kylin985ti/china-accounting-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kylin985ti/china-accounting-skills/materiality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kylin985ti/china-accounting-skills/materiality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kylin985ti/china-accounting-skills/materiality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kylin985ti/china-accounting-skills/materiality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kylin985ti/china-accounting-skills/materiality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.01498 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00749 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00300 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00150 |
Grade A, and why
materiality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
重要性水平计算
概述
依据 CAS 1221 — 计划和执行审计工作时的重要性。重要性水平是审计中最核心的数字——低于这个金额的错报可以容忍,高于的必须深究。正确计算重要性水平直接影响审计效率和效果。
三个层次的重要性
财务报表整体重要性 (Overall Materiality)
↓
实际执行的重要性 (Performance Materiality) = 50%-75%
↓
明显微小错报临界值 (Clearly Trivial) = 3%-5%
一、财务报表整体重要性
计算步骤
- 选择合适的基准(见下表)
- 确定适用的百分比
- 计算:基准 × 百分比 = 财务报表整体重要性
基准选择指南
| 被审计单位情况 | 推荐基准 | 典型百分比范围 |
|---|---|---|
| 盈利稳定(最常见) | 经常性业务税前利润 | 5% – 10% |
| 微利/微亏/盈亏交替 | 过去3-5年平均税前利润(取绝对值)/ 营业收入 | 0.5%–1%(收入) |
| 新设企业、在建期、无收入 | 总资产 | 0.5% – 2% |
| 新兴行业、抢占市场份额 | 营业收入 | 0.5% – 1% |
| 房地产(利润波动大) | 总资产 或 毛利 | 0.5% – 1% |
| 基金管理 | 净资产 | 0.5% – 1% |
| 非营利组织 | 收入总额或费用总额 | 1% – 2% |
| 研发中心(成本加成) | 成本与营业费用总额 | 1% – 2% |
计算示例
📋 重要性水平计算表
索引号:AB-4
════════════════════════════════════
被审计单位:XX科技有限公司
审计期间:2026年度
一、选择基准
分析:公司连续3年盈利,净利润稳定在100-200万之间
选择基准:经常性业务税前利润 = 1,500,000
理由:盈利稳定,税前利润最能反映经营成果
二、确定百分比
选择:7%(取5%-10%中间值)
考虑因素:
□ 是否涉及公众利益?否 → 可取较高%
□ 是否存在特别风险?否
□ 以前年度是否有重大调整?否
三、计算
财务报表整体重要性 = 1,500,000 × 7% = 105,000
────────────────────────────────────
结论:当错报金额超过 105,000 元时,认为对财务报表有重大影响
════════════════════════════════════
二、实际执行的重要性
实际执行的重要性 = 财务报表整体重要性 × (50% – 75%)
| 风险水平 | 比例 | 适用情况 |
|---|---|---|
| 较高风险 | 50% | 首次审计、以前年度发现较多错报、内部控制薄弱 |
| 中等风险 | 60%-65% | 一般中小企业 |
| 较低风险 | 70%-75% | 连续审计、以前年度错报少、内控有效 |
示例(续)
项目风险较高(首次审计,内控薄弱)
→ 实际执行的重要性 = 105,000 × 50% = 52,500
含义:单个科目实质性程序中,超过 52,500 元的项目需要逐一检查
三、明显微小错报临界值
明显微小临界值 = 财务报表整体重要性 × (3% – 5%)
超过这个金额的错报需要累积并在最终汇总评价是否重大。
明显微小临界值 = 105,000 × 5% = 5,250
含义:低于 5,250 元的错报可以不累积(视为明显微小)
高于 5,250 元的错报必须记录在审计差异汇总表中
三层次重要性一览
📊 重要性水平汇总
═══════════════════════════════════
层次 金额 用途
────────────────────────────────────
财务报表整体重要性 105,000 判断报表整体是否公允
高于此金额→重大,必须要求管理层更正
实际执行的重要性 52,500 单项实质性程序中的执行标准
高于此金额→逐一检查,低于可抽样
明显微小临界值 5,250 单独错报是否需要累积
高于此金额→必须累积到差异汇总表
═══════════════════════════════════
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 147 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 365094233b1b
materiality is a skill published in the GitHub repository kylin985ti/china-accounting-skills (56 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 1,498 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
expense-review-policy
Review invoices and contracts against accounts-payable policy before human approval.
audit-support
Support SOX 404 compliance with control testing methodology, sample selection, and documentation standards. Use when generating testing workpapers, selecting audit samples, classifying control deficiencies, or preparing for internal or external audits.
kyc-doc-parse
Parse an investor or client onboarding packet into structured KYC fields — identity, ownership, control, source of funds, and document inventory. Use as the first step of KYC screening; output feeds the rules engine.
fiscaliste
Fiscaliste IA pour la fiscalité personnelle des particuliers français : optimisation et déclaration de l'impôt sur le revenu, IFI, revenus du capital, revenus fonciers, equity salarial, crypto-actifs et PER. Couvre le calcul de l'IR (barème, quotient familial, décote, PAS, CEHR, revenus exceptionnels), la déclaration…
regulatory-analysis
Analyzes documents and processes against FINRA, SEC, Federal Reserve, and CFPB regulatory frameworks. Identifies compliance gaps, classifies findings by severity, and recommends remediation. Use when performing compliance audits, regulatory reviews, gap analyses, or verifying policy adherence to financial regulations.
subcontractor-payment-tracker
Track subcontractor payments, lien waivers, and compliance. Manage payment schedules and documentation.