dev-workflow

dev-workflow is a skill for Claude Code from kzytateishi/spikeee-plugins-marketplace. It costs 54 tokens per session (801 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guided development workflow that moves a feature from written requirements through implementation, cleanup, review, and a pull-request summary.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to specify a feature, implement it, refactor the code, review it, and prepare its pull-request description.
Why use it?
It gives development work a defined sequence and pauses for confirmation or failed checks at key points.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter.

Part of the dev-workflow plugin — 6 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to specify a feature, implement it, refactor the code, review it, and prepare its pull-request description.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/kzytateishi/spikeee-plugins-marketplace/dev-workflow
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add kzytateishi/spikeee-plugins-marketplace --skill dev-workflow
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kzytateishi/spikeee-plugins-marketplace

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install dev-workflow, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 6 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for dev-workflow

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kzytateishi/spikeee-plugins-marketplace/dev-workflow/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kzytateishi/spikeee-plugins-marketplace/dev-workflow)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kzytateishi/spikeee-plugins-marketplace/dev-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kzytateishi/spikeee-plugins-marketplace/dev-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for dev-workflow

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kzytateishi/spikeee-plugins-marketplace/dev-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kzytateishi/spikeee-plugins-marketplace/dev-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 54 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 801 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00054 $0.00801
Opus 5.5 $0.00022 $0.00320
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00160
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00080

Measured 2mo ago against content hash dd9b6ff0f6d1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

dev-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/dev-workflow/skills/dev-workflow/SKILL.md · 95 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Dev Workflow — Full Workflow

Run the complete development workflow for $ARGUMENTS.

Execution Mode

Run all steps sequentially. By default, pause after Step 1 (specify) and present the spec to the user for confirmation before proceeding to implementation. Steps 2–5 run automatically, stopping only on gate failures.

Skip the specify confirmation only when the user explicitly requests it (e.g., "確認不要", "skip confirmation", "そのまま進めて").

Workflow

Each step MUST pass its gate condition before proceeding to the next step.

Step 1: /specify     → Generate specification + task list
  GATE: user confirmation (default, skippable)
Step 2: /implement   → Implement tasks from the specification
  GATE: all tests, lint, and type checks pass
Step 3: /refactor    → Iterative refactoring (3+ rounds)
  GATE: all tests, lint, and type checks pass
Step 4: /code-review → Multi-perspective code review
  GATE: no Critical or High findings remain
Step 5: /pr-summary  → Generate PR description

Gate Failure Handling

If a gate fails, STOP the workflow and fix the issues before proceeding:

  • Step 1 confirmation gate: present the spec summary and ask the user to approve, request changes, or abort. If the user requests changes, revise the spec and ask again. Do NOT proceed to Step 2 until the user explicitly approves.
  • Step 2/3 gate failure: debug and fix until all tests, lint, and type checks pass
  • Step 4 gate failure: fix all Critical and High findings, then re-run /code-review to verify. Do NOT proceed to Step 5 with unresolved Critical or High findings.

Step 1: Specify

Generate a specification document and task list for the feature described in $ARGUMENTS.

Read and follow the full process defined in specify/SKILL.md.

User Confirmation

After generating the spec, present a summary to the user:

  • Detected scenario type
  • Key design decisions
  • Scope (number of tasks, affected files)
  • Link to order.md and todo.md

Read the full file on GitHub · 95 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 95 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A dd9b6ff0f6d1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

dev-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository kzytateishi/spikeee-plugins-marketplace (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 801 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

agent-teams-simplify-and-harden

Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills · 115 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens