Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add laolaoshiren/claude-code-skills-zh --skill api-testergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/laolaoshiren/claude-code-skills-zhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/laolaoshiren/claude-code-skills-zh/api-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/laolaoshiren/claude-code-skills-zh/api-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/laolaoshiren/claude-code-skills-zh/api-tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/laolaoshiren/claude-code-skills-zh/api-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/laolaoshiren/claude-code-skills-zh/api-tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.01424 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00570 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00285 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
api-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
API 测试助手
核心原则
- 只把可核验的 OpenAPI、代码、类型、调用方或现有测试当作契约证据。
- 生成测试不等于执行测试;读取接口定义不等于可以访问真实服务。
- 保护现有数据、凭据和用户修改,优先使用隔离且可清理的测试环境。
工作流程
1. 读取项目与接口证据
先读取适用的仓库规则、测试说明、Git 状态和项目脚本,再按实际存在情况检查:
- OpenAPI / Swagger 文件及其引用的 Schema。
- 路由、controller、handler、DTO、验证器和错误处理中间件。
- 客户端类型、调用方、公开文档和现有 API 测试。
- 测试配置、fixture、认证方式、环境变量模板和数据清理机制。
记录规范、实现与现有测试之间的不一致。无法确定哪个行为才是期望契约时,列出证据并请求确认,不用新测试固化猜测。
2. 建立契约矩阵
为目标 endpoint 记录:
| 项目 | 证据 |
|---|---|
| method 与 path | OpenAPI 或路由位置 |
| 认证与权限 | security scheme、中间件或调用方 |
| 请求参数与约束 | Schema、DTO 或验证器 |
| 已声明响应 | 状态码、响应结构与 header |
| 副作用与幂等性 | 实现、文档或调用链 |
| 测试环境与清理 | fixture、事务或 teardown |
不要默认每个接口都应返回 400、401、403、404、422 或 500。只有契约已声明或代码路径真实可达时才生成对应断言。
3. 明确环境与授权
在执行任何请求前确认:
- Base URL、环境归属以及是否为 local、test、staging 或 production。
- 测试账号、权限范围和凭据来源。
- 是否允许执行 POST、PUT、PATCH、DELETE、上传、支付、通知等有副作用操作。
- 测试数据隔离、唯一标识、清理或事务回滚方案。
用户只要求“生成测试”时只产出代码。生产环境、共享 staging、第三方服务及任何可能改变真实数据的执行都必须获得明确授权。GET 也不能仅凭 method 判定无副作用。
4. 选择项目锁定的工具
- 优先运行仓库已有的 test、OpenAPI lint 或 contract test script。
- 读取 package manager、lockfile 和已安装版本后再选择命令。
- 不用裸
npx、全局工具或临时下载的最新版解析规范。 - 缺少依赖时先报告;安装工具、更新 lockfile 或修改测试配置需要单独授权。
- 使用真正的 YAML / JSON / OpenAPI 解析器,不用
grep推断嵌套 Schema。
5. 设计有依据的用例
按目标契约选择必要场景:
- 成功路径:使用最小合法输入验证状态、结构和关键语义。
- 边界路径:只测试 Schema 或实现中真实存在的长度、范围、枚举、格式和必填约束。
- 认证与权限:只覆盖已声明的身份、角色和资源归属规则。
- 失败与回归:覆盖可达错误路径、已知缺陷或兼容性要求。
- 幂等、分页、并发、重试与超时:仅在接口契约包含这些语义时测试。
断言外部可观察行为,避免绑定内部函数调用。随机数据应固定 seed,并避免真实个人信息、客户数据和生产标识。
6. 实现最小测试
- 沿用项目现有框架、目录、fixture、命名和断言风格。
- 单元测试可隔离网络、时间和第三方服务;集成测试使用受控服务或临时资源。
- 对写操作使用唯一数据,并在成功、失败和中断路径都执行清理。
- 不为让测试通过而擅自修改生产代码、接口规范或认证配置。
- 使用跨平台路径和项目脚本;平台专属命令需说明 Windows / Linux 适用范围。
7. 执行与复验
- 先检查命令是否会下载依赖、访问外部服务或改变共享状态。
- 运行最小目标测试,记录命令、环境、退出状态和真实响应摘要。
- 按风险运行相关测试、类型检查或完整测试。
- 检查 Git diff 和环境状态,确认没有残留测试数据、快照、日志、Token 或无关生成物。
- 将基线已有失败与本轮新增失败分开报告。
没有实际运行时,只能说明“已生成、未验证”。没有明确 SLA 和受控测量条件时,不添加固定耗时断言或声称性能达标。
安全边界
- 不在命令、日志、fixture 或报告中写入真实 Token、Cookie、密码和个人数据。
- 未经明确授权,不访问生产环境、真实客户账号、付费 API 或受监管系统。
- 压测、模糊测试、大批量数据生成和安全探测需要单独授权及限流方案。
- 遇到权限不足、环境不明、清理方案缺失或响应可能含敏感信息时停止执行并报告。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 119 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A b1f537163db7
api-tester is a skill published in the GitHub repository laolaoshiren/claude-code-skills-zh (894 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 1,424 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
endpoint-probe
Probes each major Agent Monitor API route — /api/stats, /api/analytics, /api/sessions, /api/pricing/cost, /api/workflows/runs, /api/cc-config/overview — and reports each one's HTTP status, latency, and response shape, flagging which are reachable. Use to verify a dashboard install is wired up correctly.
writing-springboot-tests
Use when writing or adding tests for Spring Boot code at a service's edges: HTTP clients that call other services (WireMock: 4xx and 5xx responses, timeouts, retries), Kafka or RabbitMQ listeners (redelivery, poison messages, dead-letter topics), events published to other services, or full-API tests against real…
contract-test-writer
Writes consumer-driven contract tests at service and API boundaries - Pact consumer tests, provider verification, broker publishing, and can-i-deploy gates - so an incompatible change fails a build instead of breaking integrations in production. Use when someone asks "how do I stop the backend breaking my client"…
devlab-integration-fullstack
A guide to testing complete business flows across a frontend, backend services, databases, and other connected systems. It uses tools such as Playwright, Jest, SuperTest, Testcontainers, and mock servers to test multi-service setups.
dev-ship
Fechamento de feature — verificação goal-backward antes de declarar pronto. Roda Must-Haves do PLAN.md, executa o demo script, revisa o diff completo procurando bugs e restos (debug logs, TODOs, código morto), passa lente de segurança nos arquivos tocados, escreve SUMMARY.md e arquiva o plano. Use quando o usuário…
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.