Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LarsCowe/bmalph --skill bmad-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LarsCowe/bmalphWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/larscowe/bmalph/bmad-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/larscowe/bmalph/bmad-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/larscowe/bmalph/bmad-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/larscowe/bmalph/bmad-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/larscowe/bmalph/bmad-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00066 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00026 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00013 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00007 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- bmad-code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- bmad-code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- bmad-code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- bmad-code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- bmad-code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- bmad-code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- bmad-code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- bmad-code-review — 100% identical
What it actually says
Follow the instructions in ./workflow.md.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 7 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A baca10e02574
bmad-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository LarsCowe/bmalph (405 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 66 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ensemble-beads-build
Drive an existing bead hierarchy to completion through the full builder, code-review, and close pipeline (Codex skill for /ensemble:beads-build).
ensemble-discover-standards
Analyze codebase and extract coding conventions into a standards/ directory with index.yml (Codex skill for /ensemble:discover-standards).
joycraft-design
Design discussion before decomposition — produce a 200-line design artifact for human review, catching wrong assumptions before they propagate into specs.
joycraft-spec-done
Lightweight per-spec wrap-up — bump status to in-review, terse discovery if surprised, commit. Run after each spec in checkpoint/isolated mode; no validation, no push, no PR.
bmad-review-edge-case-hunter
Walk every branching path and boundary condition in content, report only unhandled edge cases. Orthogonal to adversarial review - method-driven not attitude-driven. Use when you need exhaustive edge-case analysis of code, specs, or diffs.
bmad-code-review
Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers (Blind Hunter, Edge Case Hunter, Acceptance Auditor) with structured triage into actionable categories. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code".