Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossiangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00194 | $0.07847 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00078 | $0.03139 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00039 | $0.01569 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00785 |
Grade A, and why
founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 570 lines · 194 tokens per session scan A ab625075215b
founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian is a skill published in the GitHub repository lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills (900 stars, last pushed 8d ago), with no licence file. It adds 194 tokens to every session and 7,847 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
obligations-extractor
Pulls every obligation, deadline, condition and notice requirement out of a contract into a structured ledger, without evaluating whether any of it is fair, onerous or negotiable. Use this whenever a user wants a list, table or calendar of what a contract actually requires — including phrasings like "list every…
startup-compliance-checker
Checks the compliance obligations applicable to a startup given its entity structure, stage, and sector — post-incorporation and structural filings, DPIIT recognition considerations, funding-triggered compliance, and ESOP-related requirements — flagging current specific forms, deadlines, and fees for verification…
transaction-document-checker
Checks a transaction closing set against the term sheet, definitive agreement, and conditions-precedent checklist — which documents are executed, which conditions precedent and approvals are satisfied, which filings and registrations remain, whose signature is missing, and what deliverable is outstanding. Use this…
tender-compliance-checker
Check a public or private tender, RFP, RFQ, auction, or bid for eligibility, responsiveness, technical and commercial evidence, forms, securities, portal mechanics, and deadlines. Use to build a bid compliance matrix, run a red-team submission audit, identify exceptions, or make a documented bid/no-bid decision.
closing-checklist-builder
Builds and runs a closing checklist for a financing or other transaction — conditions precedent, corporate approvals, security perfection steps, legal opinions, know-your-customer items, fee letters, signing and dating mechanics, deliverables by party, conditions subsequent and post-closing filings — with owners…
launch-review
Full launch review against your framework and risk calibration. Use when the user says "review this launch", "legal review for [feature]", "can we ship this", "what are the legal issues with [product]", or references a launch tracker ticket or PRD that needs a category-by-category review memo.