Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill tender-compliance-checkergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/tender-compliance-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/tender-compliance-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/tender-compliance-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/tender-compliance-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/tender-compliance-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.00758 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00303 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
tender-compliance-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Tender Compliance Checker
I am using the Tender Compliance Checker skill from Rohas Legal AI: traceable requirements, evidence, deviations, blockers and submission control. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.
Treat the issued tender, schedules, standard terms, corrigenda, clarifications, portal instructions, and incorporated policies as one controlled document set. Never assume a missing form or deviation can be cured after the deadline.
Intake
Obtain the complete tender package, all addenda and pre-bid answers, procurement portal record, authority and jurisdiction, bid structure, bidder and affiliates, consortium or subcontractors, credentials, technical solution, pricing, securities, submission deadline and timezone, and internal owners and approvals.
Checking method
- Create a document register with issue dates, versions, hierarchy, addenda, incorporated documents, conflicts, and bidder acknowledgements.
- Extract every requirement into a traceable matrix: source and clause, exact requirement, mandatory or evaluative status, pass condition, evidence, form, owner, dependency, due date, response location, and review status.
- Test eligibility and exclusion criteria, registrations, licences, experience, turnover and net worth, similar contracts, conflicts, litigation disclosures, debarment, sanctions, beneficial ownership, integrity, tax and labour compliance.
- Check consortium, joint-venture, affiliate, OEM, key-personnel, subcontractor, local-presence, local-content, MSE, startup, preference, and reciprocity rules against the exact definitions and evidence requirements.
- Reconcile specifications, scope, deviations, deliverables, methods, staffing, milestones, service levels, acceptance, warranties, implementation, and proofs.
- Audit pricing schedules and BOQ for currency, taxes, arithmetic, units, discounts, escalation, omissions, conditional pricing, signatures, locks, and consistency with the technical offer without altering protected source workbooks casually.
- Verify bid security or declaration, performance security commitments, powers of attorney, board approvals, declarations, notarisation, apostille, signatures, digital certificates, file formats, size limits, naming, encryption, and sealing.
- Rehearse portal submission, access, uploads, signatures, payment, final submit, receipt capture, deadline and timezone. Keep a fallback and escalation plan.
- For India public procurement, verify the latest applicable GFR compilation, goods, works, consultancy or non-consultancy manual, GeM or portal rules, preference orders, restrictions, vigilance guidance, and procuring-entity terms.
- Separate curable gaps, material deviations, clarification questions, approval- dependent exceptions, and absolute blockers. Recheck every addendum before filing.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 66 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 03a87151d9f0
tender-compliance-checker is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (149 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 758 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-21.
Other skills, from other repositories
founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian
A drafting-and-review copilot for a founders' / co-founders' agreement — the terms fixing equity, vesting, IP, roles, control, deadlock, and departure between cofounders. Jurisdiction-agnostic, anchored on the Delaware C-corp default. Two modes: DRAFT (intake → equity & vesting → clauses → blocker triage →…
local-counsel-manager-scott-margetts
End-to-end external local counsel lifecycle management for multi-jurisdiction legal matters. LC selection criteria and capability assessment, engagement setup and instruction design, performance monitoring and check-in cadence, scope enforcement, and relationship escalation. Use when selecting local counsel for a…
collaboration-platform-advisor-scott-margetts
Collaboration platform configuration methodology for legal matter sites. Site architecture, workflow identification, dashboard design, data quality governance, and user adoption for SharePoint, Teams, and equivalent platforms. M365 is the reference implementation — outputs are platform-agnostic enough to brief IT or…
matter-allocation-instruction
Firm-matter matching, matter instruction drafting, firm onboarding checklist, and instruction audit for in-house legal ops teams. Match a new matter to the right panel firm by practice area, jurisdiction, complexity, and cost tier. Produce a structured matter instruction with scope, timeline, budget, staffing, and…
meeting-briefing-anthropic
Prepare structured briefings for meetings with legal relevance and track resulting action items. Use when preparing for contract negotiations, board meetings, compliance reviews, or any meeting where legal context, background research, or action tracking is needed.
rfp-pitch-management
RFP creation, distribution, evaluation, and shortlisting for in-house legal teams selecting outside counsel. Draft a new legal services RFP from scratch, evaluate firm responses against weighted criteria, produce a shortlist recommendation with selection rationale for GC sign-off, or design the end-to-end RFP process…