Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Learning-Bayesian-Statistics/baygent-skills --skill amortized-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Learning-Bayesian-Statistics/baygent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/learning-bayesian-statistics/baygent-skills/amortized-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/learning-bayesian-statistics/baygent-skills/amortized-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/learning-bayesian-statistics/baygent-skills/amortized-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/learning-bayesian-statistics/baygent-skills/amortized-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/learning-bayesian-statistics/baygent-skills/amortized-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00145 | $0.06300 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00058 | $0.02520 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.01260 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00630 |
Grade A, and why
amortized-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 470 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Amortized Bayesian Workflow
Workflow overview
Every amortized Bayesian analysis follows this sequence. Do not skip steps — especially simulator validation and model criticism.
- Formulate — Define the generative story. What latent variables or parameters generated the observations?
- Specify the simulator regime — The first iteration always uses offline training for fast turnaround, regardless of simulator speed. The simulator regime only determines the simulation budget for the pilot run:
- Fast simulator (< 0.05 s per draw): pre-simulate 20 000 datasets, train for 100 epochs
- Slow simulator (> 1 s – minutes per draw): pre-simulate 3 000–5 000 datasets, train for 100 epochs
- No simulator / pre-existing bank: use whatever is available; switch to disk training if it does not fit in memory Online training is a refinement step — use it only after the first offline pass shows healthy diagnostics and you want to squeeze out more performance.
- Define prior + observation model or simulation bank
- Implement prior and observation model and wrap them in a simulator
- Pre-simulate the pilot budget into a dict (using
workflow.simulate(N)) for offline training - If the simulator is external or proprietary, ensure simulations are already generated from the intended prior and data-generating process
- Choose the architecture — this step is critical; getting it wrong ruins inference. See
references/conditioning.mdfor the full conditioning logic and decision table.- "Simple vector" means the observation is a single fixed-length feature vector whose element order is meaningful (e.g., 5 named sensor readings, a pre-computed summary statistic). Only then: route through
inference_conditionswith no summary network. - Set-based / exchangeable data — If the simulator produces N observations that are exchangeable, the data is a set, not a vector. This includes: N i.i.d. draws, regression datasets with (x, y) pairs, repeated measurements, trial-level data, cross-sectional samples. Route through
summary_variableswith aSetTransformer. Never put this ininference_conditions. - Time series — ordered sequences: route through
summary_variableswithTimeSeriesTransformerorTimeSeriesNetwork.
- "Simple vector" means the observation is a single fixed-length feature vector whose element order is meaningful (e.g., 5 named sensor readings, a pre-computed summary statistic). Only then: route through
- Images as conditions / observations for parameter inference — route through
summary_variableswithConvolutionalNetwork. - Images as inferential targets — conditional image generation, spatial field generation, denoising, and other image-valued outputs require an image-capable diffusion inference network. Use
bf.networks.DiffusionModel(subnet=...)withUNet,UViT, orResidualUViT; seereferences/image-generation.md. - A workflow can use both slots simultaneously. Fixed-length metadata (e.g., sample size N, scalar design variables) can go in
inference_conditionswhile structured observations go insummary_variables. - When in doubt, use a summary network. It is always safer to include one than to omit one; a summary network will always be needed if the data has more than one axis.
- Build the workflow — Prefer
bf.BasicWorkflow(...)- Decide on which variables to auto-standardize. Prefer
standardize="all"unless you have verfied that the simulator outputs are already in a good range for the networks.
- Decide on which variables to auto-standardize. Prefer
- Run simulation sanity checks — Before training, verify that simulated data look plausible and span the relevant range of real observations. Again, pay attention to what needs to be standardized.
- Train the amortizer — First iteration always uses offline training for fast feedback:
workflow.fit_offline(...)with the pre-simulated pilot budget (default first pass)workflow.fit_online(...)only as a refinement step after offline diagnostics look healthy, or when the user explicitly requests itworkflow.fit_disk(...)if streaming simulations from disk Always offer to run training in the terminal so the user can monitor progress interactively.
- Diagnose in silico — Use held-out simulations with known ground truth using the workflow's built-in diagnostics:
workflow.compute_default_diagnostics(...)for numerical results andworkflow.plot_default_diagnostics(...)for visual diagnostics. - Amortized inference on real data — Use
workflow.sample(...) - Posterior predictive checks (PPCs) — Re-simulate data from posterior samples and compare to the real data using model-specific test quantities
- Write a report — Use
references/reporting.mdto generate a structured report outlining results and next steps.
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- README.md 5.2 KB
- references/adapter.md 8.5 KB
- references/augmentation.md 1.1 KB
- references/conditioning.md 4.3 KB
- references/custom-summary.md 2.8 KB
- references/image-generation.md 5.9 KB
- references/model-sizes.md 5.4 KB
- references/reporting.md 8.8 KB
- scripts/check_diagnostics.py 11 KB runs code
- scripts/inspect_training.py 6.4 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago Changed · +145 tokens per session b52b139696fc
- 2mo ago First seen · 470 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 81ff5e9a54b1
amortized-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository Learning-Bayesian-Statistics/baygent-skills (186 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 145 tokens to every session and 6,300 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
amortized-workflow compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| amortized-workflowLearning-Bayesian-Statistics/baygent-skills | Skill | 186 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 145 | Claude Code, Codex |
| instrument-data-to-allotropeanthropics/knowledge-work-plugins | Skill | 35k | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 123 | Claude Code |
| exploratory-data-analysisK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 83 | Claude Code |
| matlabK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code |
| phylogeneticsK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 71 | Claude Code, Codex |
| research-engineerdavila7/claude-code-templates | Skill | 33k | yesterday | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code, Codex |
| mapping-to-snomedmaziyarpanahi/openmed | Skill | 5.8k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 205 | Claude Code |