systematic-debugging

A four-phase method for investigating bugs, failed tests, build problems, performance issues, and other unexpected behavior. It requires finding and confirming the underlying cause before changing the code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect error messages, trace failures, compare working and broken cases, test hypotheses, and then implement a verified correction.
Why use it?
It reduces guesswork and avoids quick patches that hide the real problem or create new bugs. Each possible explanation is checked against evidence before a fix is proposed.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/leei1337/phantom-neural-cortex/systematic-debugging
Any agent
npx skills add LEEI1337/phantom-neural-cortex --skill systematic-debugging
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LEEI1337/phantom-neural-cortex

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 44 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,311 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 92% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00044 $0.02311
Opus 5 $0.00022 $0.01156
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00462
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00231

Measured 2d ago against content hash fd0afd5729d2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

systematic-debugging scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

92% identical to systematic-debugging — 32 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md · 296 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 296 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Systematic Debugging

Overview

Random fixes waste time and create new bugs. Quick patches mask underlying issues.

Core principle: ALWAYS find root cause before attempting fixes. Symptom fixes are failure.

Violating the letter of this process is violating the spirit of debugging.

The Iron Law

NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST

If you haven't completed Phase 1, you cannot propose fixes.

When to Use

Use for ANY technical issue:

  • Test failures
  • Bugs in production
  • Unexpected behavior
  • Performance problems
  • Build failures
  • Integration issues

Use this ESPECIALLY when:

  • Under time pressure (emergencies make guessing tempting)
  • "Just one quick fix" seems obvious
  • You've already tried multiple fixes
  • Previous fix didn't work
  • You don't fully understand the issue

Don't skip when:

  • Issue seems simple (simple bugs have root causes too)
  • You're in a hurry (rushing guarantees rework)
  • Manager wants it fixed NOW (systematic is faster than thrashing)

The Four Phases

You MUST complete each phase before proceeding to the next.

Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation

BEFORE attempting ANY fix:

  1. Read Error Messages Carefully

    • Don't skip past errors or warnings
    • They often contain the exact solution
    • Read stack traces completely
    • Note line numbers, file paths, error codes
  2. Reproduce Consistently

    • Can you trigger it reliably?
    • What are the exact steps?
    • Does it happen every time?
    • If not reproducible → gather more data, don't guess
  3. Check Recent Changes

    • What changed that could cause this?
    • Git diff, recent commits
    • New dependencies, config changes
    • Environmental differences
  4. Gather Evidence in Multi-Component Systems

    WHEN system has multiple components (CI → build → signing, API → service → database):

    BEFORE proposing fixes, add diagnostic instrumentation:

    For EACH component boundary:
      - Log what data enters component
      - Log what data exits component
      - Verify environment/config propagation
      - Check state at each layer
    
    Run once to gather evidence showing WHERE it breaks
    THEN analyze evidence to identify failing component
    THEN investigate that specific component
    

Read the full file on GitHub · 296 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 296 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A fd0afd5729d2

Subscribe to this mod's changes

systematic-debugging is a skill published in the GitHub repository LEEI1337/phantom-neural-cortex (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 2,311 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to systematic-debugging, differing in 32 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

brain-load

Load project context from the Claude Brain Logseq graph into the current session. Triggers: "load brain", "load ", "resume ", "continue work on ", "what do we know about ". Don't fire for write operations (use brain-save), generic questions about Logseq itself, or "open " / "switch to " requests that mean opening…

jame581/LogseqBrain · 96 tokens

brain-doctor

Lint and repair the Claude Brain Logseq graph — find and fix format violations that create phantom pages or broken macros. Triggers: "brain doctor", "lint brain", "check brain health", "clean up brain", "fix brain", "graph hygiene", "why are there empty pages", "find broken pages", "backfill digests", "rebuild digest…

jame581/LogseqBrain · 114 tokens

brain-save

Save session context, decisions, progress, and plans to the Claude Brain Logseq graph. Triggers: "save to brain", "save this", "remember this", "store this decision", "log this", "save progress", "before I quit", "wrap up". Don't fire for read operations (use brain-load) or status checks (use brain-status).

jame581/LogseqBrain · 77 tokens

brain-status

Show a dashboard of all projects in the Claude Brain graph, or graph analytics. Dashboard triggers: "brain status", "show projects", "show brain", "what's in my brain", "project dashboard", "brain overview", "list projects", "summary". Analytics triggers: "brain stats", "graph analytics", "graph activity over time".…

jame581/LogseqBrain · 89 tokens

brain-init

Set up the Claude Brain Logseq graph (first-time) or add a new project page. Triggers: "init brain", "setup brain", "init brain project ", "add project to brain". Don't fire for loads, saves, or status checks — those are handled by brain-load, brain-save, and brain-status.

jame581/LogseqBrain · 71 tokens

web-app-penetration-testing

Pentest a web app or website end to end — black-box testing of a live URL, staging environment, or local dev server that finds and exploits real vulnerabilities (auth bypass, broken access control, IDOR, injection, XSS, SSRF, business logic) and proves each one with a working proof-of-concept instead of a signature…

usestrix/strix · 129 tokens