Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LegalQuants/lq-skills --skill uk-disclosure-list-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LegalQuants/lq-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/legalquants/lq-skills/uk-disclosure-list-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/legalquants/lq-skills/uk-disclosure-list-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/legalquants/lq-skills/uk-disclosure-list-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/legalquants/lq-skills/uk-disclosure-list-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/legalquants/lq-skills/uk-disclosure-list-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.01417 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00709 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00283 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
uk-disclosure-list-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 156 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
uk-disclosure-list-review
When to Use
- A user has a draft disclosure list, disclosure review export, or document schedule.
- The team needs to check whether obvious sources, custodians, adverse documents, or inspection objections are missing.
- Privilege, confidentiality, redaction, or inspection wording needs first-pass review.
- The matter is in England and Wales civil litigation.
This skill is a quality-control workflow. It does not make final privilege calls or certify disclosure compliance.
Audience and Work Shape
Audience: England and Wales litigation associates, paralegals, and disclosure-support teams preparing a disclosure list or QC report for solicitor/partner review.
Work shape: pattern-matched review with accretive judgment elements. The skill maps coverage and flags privilege/adverse-document issues; it does not certify disclosure compliance.
Legal Failure Modes
- Legal support, not legal advice: the report is a QC aid, not a certification of compliance or privilege.
- Privilege/confidentiality: disclosure review may itself be privileged work product. Keep outputs inside the privilege group unless a responsible lawyer approves circulation.
- Accountability: the responsible solicitor decides privilege, inspection, adverse-document significance, and whether the list is adequate.
Access Modes
This skill works in three modes:
- Live source mode - use browser, web search, MCP, API, or other configured access to retrieve rules, orders, filings, document lists, or repository exports.
- User-supplied source mode - use uploaded or pasted disclosure lists, pleadings, chronologies, witness statements, search records, document schedules, rules, or orders supplied by the user.
- No-source mode - prepare a disclosure QC checklist and source-request list, but do not state that coverage, privilege, inspection, or adverse-document issues exist.
If the disclosure list, source documents, search record, or governing order cannot be retrieved or supplied, mark the relevant issue source_missing or verify_current_rule. Do not infer disclosure defects from model memory.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 156 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 883244657300
uk-disclosure-list-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository LegalQuants/lq-skills (54 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 1,417 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Privilege Log Review
Use when conducting a first-pass review of a privilege log to sort entries into three tiers — confidently privileged, uncertain (flagged for attorney decision), and recommend-remove — so attorney review time focuses on the entries that require judgment.
patent-disclosure-skill
A Chinese patent-work assistant for finding invention ideas, writing patent disclosures, explaining patents in plain language, tracking policy changes, and preparing responses to examiner notices.
patent-search
A search tool for published Chinese patent records, using fields such as inventor, applicant, classification number, and title.
patent-docket
A workflow coordinator for patent case files, from an inventor's technical disclosure to patent application documents. A patent docket is the tracked record of a patent matter, including its stage, questions, drafts, and handoffs.
patent-application
A patent-application document workflow that turns supplied invention materials into claims, a description, an abstract, and black-and-white drawings. It can also produce Markdown and Word files.
patent-disclosure
A guided workflow for finding patentable ideas, doing a limited prior-art search, and drafting a Chinese patent disclosure document. A disclosure document describes an invention for later patent drafting.