Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/leifericf/agentic-sdk/check-securitynpx skills add leifericf/agentic-sdk --skill check-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/leifericf/agentic-sdkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leifericf/agentic-sdk/check-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leifericf/agentic-sdk/check-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leifericf/agentic-sdk/check-security.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01180 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00590 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00236 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
check-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
check-security
Role: review the shard for security defects.
Failure model: untrusted input reaches an unsafe operation, a boundary that should enforce a capability does not, or a path crosses a trust line without a check.
Trust boundaries are project-specific, but the shape repeats. Read the
descriptor and design docs for the project's trust boundaries, and the
recurring defect-class catalog in references/known-pitfalls.md,
before sweeping. The general trust lines:
- Caller-supplied data at a native edge is untrusted. A seq, stream,
iterator, or buffer from the calling language, materialized into a
fixed-size native array, must be bounded before it is realized (the
load-bearing rule in
skills/shared/references/architecture.md). The native length guard is the second line of defence, not the first. - Files and paths from outside the trust line are untrusted. A malformed header, a symlink loop, a path with crafted unicode, a parent directory the process does not own.
- Caches and persisted state read back at startup are untrusted at read time. A corrupt or attacker-written cache file must fail clean.
- Credentials, tokens, and entitlements are untrusted. A forged or corrupted entitlement must not grant elevated behavior or crash the process.
- The native edge itself is a memory-safety boundary. A native body that retains a caller-owned pointer, double-frees a handle, or reads past a slice's length is a critical finding; native memory unsafety reachable from untrusted input is the highest-severity bug class.
- Extension or scripting entry points are partially trusted. They must not reach the filesystem, the network, or process spawning except through an explicit capability gate.
Look for
- Buffer arithmetic. Every allocation and copy whose size flows from a file header, a network read, or caller input. Size-doubling growth without an overflow guard. Any user-controlled count flowing into indexing.
- Filesystem.
statversuslstatin walks; path joins with user-supplied components; TOCTOU between check and use; symlink handling in a recursive walk; paths with control characters or null bytes. - Parser surfaces. Any decoder for an external format (a media container, a serialization format, a wire protocol): a header that claims a size larger than the payload, a count of zero or absurdly large, a field the decoder does not support. Each must error, not crash or read past the buffer.
- Native handle lifetime. For every handle type at the edge: is the finalizer or destructor registered? Can the handle be used after free? Can two threads free the same handle? Is the handle stored in a global another module could free from under the owner? The ownership discipline itself is check-memory's; the reachability from untrusted input is here.
- Capability boundary. Extension or scripting entry points must not reach filesystem, network, or process-spawning primitives except through explicit gates. An unrestricted eval against untrusted input is a finding.
- Entitlement validation. A credential or entitlement parser must reject corrupt signatures cleanly; the entitlement path must not be writable by an attacker via a path trick; an expired or invalid entitlement must downgrade cleanly without leaving elevated behavior on.
- Crash reachability. For each abort, panic, unreachable, or hard assertion in the shard: can untrusted input steer execution there? An untrusted-input-driven crash is the desktop equivalent of a server-side denial of service.
- Secrets. A credential, key, or token written to a log, embedded in an error message, or committed to the repository.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 116 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 7e4c60ce40f0
check-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository leifericf/agentic-sdk (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,180 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…