Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lensesio/agentic-engineering-for-apache-kafka --skill kafka-schema-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lensesio/agentic-engineering-for-apache-kafkaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lensesio/agentic-engineering-for-apache-kafka/kafka-schema-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lensesio/agentic-engineering-for-apache-kafka/kafka-schema-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lensesio/agentic-engineering-for-apache-kafka/kafka-schema-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lensesio/agentic-engineering-for-apache-kafka/kafka-schema-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lensesio/agentic-engineering-for-apache-kafka/kafka-schema-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00089 | $0.01550 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00620 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00310 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00155 |
Grade A, and why
kafka-schema-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 174 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Kafka Schema Evolution Review
Reviews schema changes for compatibility and evolution best practices. A single breaking schema change can take down every consumer of a topic.
Target environment: $ARGUMENTS
Workflow
Copy this checklist and track your progress:
Schema Review Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Fetch registered schemas
- [ ] Step 2: Scan codebase for schema files
- [ ] Step 3: Detect breaking changes
- [ ] Step 4: Check schema quality
- [ ] Step 5: Check schema drift
- [ ] Step 6: Generate report
- Fetch registered schemas from the live cluster via Lenses MCP
- Scan codebase for schema definition files (see
references/compatibility-rules.mdfor file types) - Detect breaking changes against compatibility rules in
references/compatibility-rules.md - Check schema quality against best practices
- Check schema drift between repo and cluster
- Report findings with migration guidance
Step 1: Fetch Registered Schemas
Use Lenses MCP tools to get the current state of schemas in the cluster:
list_topic_metadata- get all schemas registered against topics (key and value)get_topic_metadata- get the current schema for a specific topicget_dataset- get dataset field-level details, policies and governance metadatalist_datasetswithschema_formatfilter - find all topics using a given format (AVRO, JSON, PROTOBUF)
Expected output: Map of topics to their registered schemas (key and value) with format and version info.
Validation: If no schemas are registered, note this as a governance gap and proceed with codebase-only analysis.
Step 2: Codebase Inspection
Search the codebase for schema definition files. Consult references/compatibility-rules.md for the full list of file types and search patterns.
Use git diff to identify recently changed schema files if reviewing a PR.
Step 3: Compatibility Checks
For each schema change, evaluate against the compatibility rules in references/compatibility-rules.md. Check backward, forward and full compatibility depending on the topic's configured compatibility level.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 174 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A 78619485ecc7
kafka-schema-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository lensesio/agentic-engineering-for-apache-kafka (65 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 89 tokens to every session and 1,550 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
engineering-skills
23 skills de engenharia prontas para produção para Claude Code. Arquitetura, frontend, backend, QA, DevOps, segurança, IA/ML, engenharia de dados, Playwright, Stripe, AWS, MS365. ferramentas Node.js, TypeScript e scripts utilitários.
review-api-compat
Use when the user asks for an API compatibility review, breaking change review, proto breaking change review, buf breaking review, OpenAPI compatibility check, gRPC backwards compatibility audit, "are these API changes breaking", "did we break the wire", contract evolution review, or backwards-compatibility audit on…
review-reliability
Use when the user asks for a reliability review, production readiness assessment, stability analysis, graceful shutdown audit, drain or rollout review, timeout review, timeout budget check, deadline propagation review, circuit breaker or bulkhead review, retry and backoff review, goroutine leak or resource leak…
api-design-reviewer
Review REST API designs for quality, consistency, and breaking changes. Lints OpenAPI specs, generates scorecards, and detects breaking changes between versions. Use when designing APIs, reviewing contracts, or managing API versioning.
graphql-contract-review
Review a GraphQL schema and a Backend-for-Frontend (BFF) contract BEFORE implementation against a GraphQL checklist (nullability, N+1, cost limits, federation, BFF thinness). Use when designing or modifying a GraphQL schema, a federated subgraph, or a BFF contract. Do not use for a REST contract (use…
review-code
Use when the user asks for a code review, architecture review, Go review, Go best practices review, protobuf review, proto or API design review, SOLID review, design pattern review, package design review, coupling or cohesion review, testability review, "review this code", "is this well designed", "is this idiomatic…