review-reliability

review-reliability is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from paultyng/skill-issue. It costs 57 tokens per session (1,862 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A structured check of software reliability, including how services shut down, communicate over gRPC, and handle failures. gRPC is a way for software services to call one another.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess a whole codebase, selected packages, or changed files for shutdown problems, missing timeouts, weak failure handling, circuit-breaker issues, and similar reliability risks.
Why use it?
It helps find conditions that could cause outages, stuck requests, or unstable service behavior before production use.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it to assess a whole codebase, selected packages, or changed files for shutdown problems, missing timeouts, weak failure handling, circuit-breaker issues, and similar reliability risks.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/paultyng/skill-issue/review-reliability
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add paultyng/skill-issue --skill review-reliability
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/paultyng/skill-issue

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-reliability

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/paultyng/skill-issue/review-reliability.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/paultyng/skill-issue/review-reliability)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/paultyng/skill-issue/review-reliability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/paultyng/skill-issue/review-reliability.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 57 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,862 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00057 $0.01862
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.00931
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00372
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00186

Measured 7d ago against content hash cd664b918169, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-reliability scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Reads agent configuration directorieslowAgent snooping

.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.

- Findings must cite probed evidence (`path:line`, grep output, command result), not pattern-matched suspicion. Per `~/.claude/rules/probe-not-assume.md`.

Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.

skills/review-reliability/SKILL.md · 148 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Reliability Review

Structured reliability review producing actionable, prioritized findings with code-level references.

Workflow

1. Scope and explore

  • Confirm scope with the user: full codebase, specific packages/directories, changed files only (PR or branch diff), or specific concern.
  • Resolve scope to a file/package list. Based on what the user requested:
    • Changed files (PR or branch): Run git diff --name-only --diff-filter=d <base>...HEAD to get changed files (default <base> is main). If the user references a PR number, use gh pr diff <number> --name-only instead. Filter to relevant file types (.go, config files, Kubernetes manifests). Derive affected Go packages from the file paths (unique parent directories containing .go files).
    • Explicit paths/packages: The user may specify directories (e.g. internal/auth/), Go package patterns (e.g. ./internal/auth/...), or individual files. When given a directory or package pattern, include all files under it.
    • Full codebase: No filtering; explore everything (default).
  • Pass the resolved scope (file list) to all exploration and investigation subagents so they only read and analyze scoped files.
  • Explore the scoped code using parallel subagents (subagent_type="explore"). Read all relevant source files, configs, Kubernetes manifests, and deployment definitions.

2. System overview

Produce a brief architecture summary covering:

  • Services, ports, and transport (gRPC, HTTP, etc.)
  • Data stores and external dependencies
  • Deployment model (if discernible)

Map the critical hot paths:

Client → Transport
  → step 1 (local / I/O annotation)
  → step 2 (DB round-trip #1)
  → step 3 (external call, round-trip #2)
  → response

Annotate each step: local vs. I/O, serial vs. parallel, cached vs. uncached.

3. Launch investigation subagent

Launch a single investigation subagent (subagent_type="generalPurpose", model: sonnet per subagent-model-routing) with the system overview, flow mapping, and in-scope file list.

Read the full file on GitHub · 148 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 148 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A cd664b918169

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-reliability is a skill published in the GitHub repository paultyng/skill-issue (9 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 1,862 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

sdd-apply

Skill "sdd-apply" from Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai, covering execution role, language domain contract, purpose, what you receive and execution and persistence contract.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 0 tokens

api-design-reviewer

Use when reviewing API designs for consistency, usability, versioning, error semantics, security, backward compatibility, and developer experience before implementation or release.

seaworld008/Commonly-used-high-value-skills · 34 tokens

kafka-connector-review

Review Kafka Connect connector configurations for common misconfigurations using the Lenses MCP server. Checks error handling, DLQ setup, converters, transforms, task count and task health. Use when user says "review connectors", "check connector configs", "why is my connector failing" or asks about Kafka Connect…

lensesio/agentic-engineering-for-apache-kafka · 79 tokens

kafka-dlq-review

Review dead letter queue implementations for completeness using the Lenses MCP server. Checks DLQ topic existence, configuration, monitoring, metadata preservation, retry logic, reprocessing paths and connector DLQ alignment. Use when user says "review dead letter queues", "check DLQ setup", "DLQ audit" or asks about…

lensesio/agentic-engineering-for-apache-kafka · 93 tokens

kafka-perf-review

Review Kafka producer and consumer performance configurations in both the live cluster (via Lenses MCP) and the codebase. Flags un-tuned defaults, anti-patterns and missing best practices. Use when user says "review Kafka performance", "check producer configs", "tune Kafka settings" or asks about throughput, batching…

lensesio/agentic-engineering-for-apache-kafka · 82 tokens

kafka-schema-review

Review Kafka schema changes (Avro, Protobuf, JSON Schema) for compatibility and evolution best practices using the Lenses MCP server. Detects breaking changes, missing defaults, schema drift and naming issues. Use when user says "review schema changes", "check schema compatibility", "will this schema break consumers"…

lensesio/agentic-engineering-for-apache-kafka · 89 tokens