Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add leonardodalinky/SciDER --skill social-science-economicsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/leonardodalinky/SciDERWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leonardodalinky/scider/social-science-economics)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leonardodalinky/scider/social-science-economics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leonardodalinky/scider/social-science-economics/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leonardodalinky/scider/social-science-economics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leonardodalinky/scider/social-science-economics.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.03493 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01747 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00699 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00349 |
Grade A, and why
social-science-economics scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 323 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Social Science and Economics
Overview
This skill covers quantitative social science and economics methods: from survey instrument validation and regression diagnostics to causal program evaluation and administrative data linkage. For causal identification strategies (IV, DiD, RDD), also see the causal-inference skill.
When to Use This Skill
- Analyzing survey data (Likert scales, factor analysis, reliability)
- Running econometric regressions with proper diagnostic tests
- Working with panel/longitudinal data
- Evaluating policy interventions or field experiments
- Merging administrative datasets with fuzzy matching
1. Survey Data Analysis
Likert Scale Handling
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import pingouin as pg
# Likert scales are ORDINAL — treat carefully
# 5-point scale: 1=Strongly Disagree, 5=Strongly Agree
# ❌ Wrong: treating Likert as continuous without justification
# ✅ Better: report median and IQR; use non-parametric tests
likert_data = pd.DataFrame({
"Q1": [3, 4, 5, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 3, 2],
"Q2": [4, 4, 5, 3, 5, 4, 4, 5, 3, 3],
"Q3": [2, 3, 4, 2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 2, 2],
"Q4": [3, 4, 4, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 3, 2],
})
# Summary statistics
print(likert_data.describe())
print("\nMedians:")
print(likert_data.median())
# Compare two groups: Mann-Whitney U (non-parametric)
from scipy.stats import mannwhitneyu
group_A = likert_data["Q1"][:5]
group_B = likert_data["Q1"][5:]
stat, p = mannwhitneyu(group_A, group_B, alternative="two-sided")
print(f"Mann-Whitney: U={stat}, p={p:.4f}")
Internal Consistency: Cronbach's Alpha
# Cronbach's alpha: measures how consistently items measure the same construct
# α ≥ 0.90: excellent, 0.80-0.89: good, 0.70-0.79: acceptable, < 0.70: questionable
alpha_result = pg.cronbach_alpha(data=likert_data)
print(f"Cronbach's α = {alpha_result[0]:.3f} (95% CI: {alpha_result[1]})")
# Item-total correlations: identify items that don't fit
for col in likert_data.columns:
rest = likert_data.drop(columns=[col])
r = likert_data[col].corr(rest.sum(axis=1))
print(f"{col}: item-total r = {r:.3f} {'⚠️ low' if r < 0.3 else '✅'}")
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 323 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 96705f5654bd
social-science-economics is a skill published in the GitHub repository leonardodalinky/SciDER (88 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 3,493 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
paper-writer
Drafts publishable paper prose from the author's own materials, from a single paragraph to a full manuscript, across STEM and non-STEM fields. Every factual claim traces to user input, verified retrieval, or field common knowledge; citations pass an independent verification ladder; delivery is clean prose with zero…
pre-submission-reviewer
Runs a pre-submission review of a technical paper across five dimensions: macro logic, writing details, English grammar, LaTeX formatting, and figure quality. Uses a reviewer-style severity taxonomy (CRITICAL / MAJOR / MINOR) and flags banned AI-tone vocabulary and em-dash misuse. Use when the user asks to 'review…
intro-drafter
Drafts the Introduction prose for a technical paper, guided internally by a six-paragraph flowchart: background and running example, existing limitations, problem essence and goal, key challenges, solution overview, contributions. Positions the paper as Technique or New Problem/Setting, aligns contributions with…
paper-polish
Polishes existing academic prose while preserving the author's meaning: grammar and flow repair, tone calibration against evidence strength, AI-tone removal, and Chinese-to-English rewriting at submission quality. Never fabricates data, citations, or claims, and flags any edit that could change scientific meaning. Use…
figure-designer
Advises on the design of the three core figures in a technical paper: the Motivated Example (Figure 1), the Solution Overview (Methodology), and the Experimental Results figures. Recommends the right design paradigm, layout, labelling, and tool for each figure type, then runs a quality-control audit. Use when the user…
tech-paper-template
Structures a technical paper's full logical skeleton using a thinking-template table (research background, limitations, key idea or goal, challenges, methodology modules, contributions), positions the paper as Technique or New Problem/Setting, and runs a four-point self-consistency check. Use when the user is…