medical-imaging-review

medical-imaging-review is a skill for Claude Code from LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skills. It costs 88 tokens per session (1,175 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A structured writing process for reviews of artificial-intelligence research on medical images such as CT, MRI, X-rays, ultrasound, and pathology slides. It covers tasks including image segmentation, object detection, and classification.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to write a survey paper, systematic review, or literature analysis of medical-imaging AI. It helps create sections, comparison tables, figure placeholders, and an organized reference list.
Why use it?
It gives a repeatable way to organize a survey, support claims with references, compare methods, and record limitations. It also guides the use of medical-imaging terms and performance measures.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md.

Good fit Use it to write a survey paper, systematic review, or literature analysis of medical-imaging AI. It helps create sections, comparison tables, figure placeholders, and an organized reference list.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/leonchaox/qinyan-academic-skills/medical-imaging-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skills --skill medical-imaging-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for medical-imaging-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leonchaox/qinyan-academic-skills/medical-imaging-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leonchaox/qinyan-academic-skills/medical-imaging-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leonchaox/qinyan-academic-skills/medical-imaging-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leonchaox/qinyan-academic-skills/medical-imaging-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for medical-imaging-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leonchaox/qinyan-academic-skills/medical-imaging-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leonchaox/qinyan-academic-skills/medical-imaging-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 88 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,175 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00088 $0.01175
Opus 5 $0.00044 $0.00588
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00235
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00118

Measured 13d ago against content hash 7c719736f518, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

medical-imaging-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/02-科学写作与学术交流/medical-imaging-review/SKILL.md · 171 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 171 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Medical Imaging AI Literature Review Skill

Write comprehensive literature reviews following a systematic 7-phase workflow.

Quick Start

  1. Initialize project with three core files:

    • CLAUDE.md - Writing guidelines and terminology
    • IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md - Staged execution plan
    • manuscript_draft.md - Main manuscript
  2. Follow the 7-phase workflow (see references/WORKFLOW.md)

  3. Use domain-specific templates (see references/DOMAINS.md)


Core Principles

Writing Style

  • Hedging language: "may", "suggests", "appears to", "has shown promising results"
  • Avoid absolutes: Never say "X is the best method"
  • Citation support: Every claim needs reference
  • Limitations: Each method section needs a Limitations paragraph

Required Elements

  • Key Points box (3-5 bullets) after title
  • Comparison table for each major section
  • Performance metrics: Dice (0.XXX), HD95 (X.XX mm)
  • Figure placeholders with detailed captions
  • References: 80-120 typical, organized by topic

Paragraph Structure

Topic sentence (main claim)
  → Supporting evidence (citations + data)
  → Analysis (critical evaluation)
  → Transition to next paragraph

Literature Sources

Use multi-source strategy for comprehensive coverage:

Source Best For Tools
ArXiv Latest DL methods, preprints search_papers, read_paper
PubMed Clinical validation, peer-reviewed pubmed_search_articles
Zotero Existing library, organized refs zotero_search_items

For MCP configuration details, see references/MCP_SETUP.md.


Standard Review Structure

# [Title]: State of the Art and Future Directions

## Key Points
- [3-5 bullets summarizing main findings]

## Abstract

## 1. Introduction
### 1.1 Clinical Background
### 1.2 Technical Challenges
### 1.3 Scope and Contributions

## 2. Datasets and Evaluation Metrics
### 2.1 Public Datasets (Table 1)
### 2.2 Evaluation Metrics

## 3. Deep Learning Methods
### 3.1 [Category 1]
### 3.2 [Category 2]
(Table 2: Method Comparison)

## 4. Downstream Applications

## 5. Commercial Products & Clinical Translation (Table 3)

## 6. Discussion
### 6.1 Current Limitations
### 6.2 Future Directions

## 7. Conclusion

## References

Read the full file on GitHub · 171 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 13d ago First seen · 171 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 7c719736f518

Subscribe to this mod's changes

medical-imaging-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skills (883 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 1,175 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

academic-research

Nested swiss-knife reference for academic literature work — find papers, fetch full-text PDFs, trace citations, write LaTeX manuscripts. First action for any "get me this paper" request: python3 /scripts/fetchpaper.py — walks arXiv → Unpaywall → Europe PMC → CORE → in-house publisher-page extraction…

Lingtai-AI/lingtai · 180 tokens

research-agent

Project-first Research pipeline with live gates, source/PDF evidence, claim boundaries, compute and publication controls; includes an optional PubMed/arXiv standard-library helper.

ellmos-ai/skills · 36 tokens

openalex

Use when the user asks about academic literature, research papers, scholarly works, authors, citations, institutions, journals, or any academic metadata. Trigger when users want to search for papers, find author profiles, track citations, discover related works, or explore academic topics. Also use when users mention…

Out-bloodspavin173/openalex-skill · 78 tokens

paper-comic

A visual-explanation workflow for showing what a research paper's method does and how it works. It analyzes the paper, proposes cover, overview, and mechanism diagrams, and waits for the user's choices before generating them.

zsyggg/paper-craft-skills · 83 tokens

scopus-researcher

Expert academic researcher using the Scopus MCP. Finds papers, retrieves full abstracts, builds author profiles, analyzes citation impact, and constructs advanced Boolean queries across the Elsevier Scopus database. Activate when asked to search for academic papers, analyze research trends, find citations, profile…

JOSETRA44/scopus-mcp · 67 tokens

lc_arxiv

A tool for searching arXiv, a public repository of research papers, mainly in science and technology.

sunchaokun/zensers · 11 tokens