chat-web

chat-web is a skill for Claude Code from leopu00/job-hunter-team. It costs 112 tokens per session (2,107 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A communication procedure for replying to a user who sends a message through the JHT web chat. It specifies the required message format and the tool that delivers the reply to the web interface.

In plain words
What is it for?
Recognising incoming web-chat messages and sending responses that the user interface can display correctly.
Why use it?
It prevents replies from disappearing because they were written to the wrong file or sent through the wrong channel. The procedure distinguishes web-chat users from other agents.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions Claude Code.

Good fit Recognising incoming web-chat messages and sending responses that the user interface can display correctly.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/leopu00/job-hunter-team/chat-web
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add leopu00/job-hunter-team --skill chat-web
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/leopu00/job-hunter-team

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for chat-web

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leopu00/job-hunter-team/chat-web/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leopu00/job-hunter-team/chat-web)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leopu00/job-hunter-team/chat-web"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leopu00/job-hunter-team/chat-web/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for chat-web

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leopu00/job-hunter-team/chat-web"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leopu00/job-hunter-team/chat-web.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 112 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,107 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Excessive Agency · line 60
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00112 $0.02107
Opus 5 $0.00056 $0.01053
Sonnet 5 $0.00022 $0.00421
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00211

Measured 10d ago against content hash aa4197a69c36, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

chat-web scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/_skills/chat-web/SKILL.md · 141 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

chat-web — user ↔ Captain protocol

The user does not sit in a tmux session. They write from the web UI. The frontend tags the message and drops it into your tmux pane. To reply, you write a single JSON line into $JHT_AGENT_DIR/chat.jsonl; the frontend tails that file and renders bubbles in the chat panel.

You don't write the JSON. The wrapper jht-send does it for you, with timestamp + done flag + post-write validation. Use it. Always.

How to recognize an incoming [CHAT]

[@utente -> @capitano] [CHAT] <whatever the user typed>
  • The envelope is identical to inter-agent messages (same [@from -> @to] shape) but the [CHAT] type and the @utente author make it unambiguous.
  • The user is a human, the profile owner — not an agent. There is no tmux send-keys you can use to reply: their session does not exist.
  • Reply to the body, not to the envelope. The user did not type the prefix; the frontend added it.

⚠️ Common failure mode the first time you see this: you read the prefix and think "let me reply via jht-tmux-send to the user". jht-tmux-send UTENTE ... returns exit 2 (no such session). Do not start debugging — just remember that [CHAT]jht-send. Always.

⚠️ The user is NON-TECHNICAL — no terminal, no CLI, no slash commands

A [CHAT] message comes from the desktop app (or Telegram). The user does not have a terminal, the Claude Code CLI, /mcp, slash commands, or file access. They are not a developer. NEVER tell them to:

  • run /mcp, /config, or any slash command,
  • open a terminal / run a CLI command / edit a file / "authorize a tool",
  • do anything you could do yourself.

Telling a desktop user "type /mcp in the terminal" is a dead end — they can't. If a task needs a capability you don't have wired up, solve it yourself with code instead of bouncing the work back to the user. You are the team; the user is the client. Figure it out.

Example: sending an email — you do NOT need an MCP/Gmail tool

The team already has email credentials at $JHT_HOME/credentials/email_monitor.json (a Gmail app-password — valid for SMTP too). Write a tiny Python script and send it:

Read the full file on GitHub · 141 lines

Files

What ships with it

6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 141 lines · 112 tokens per session scan A aa4197a69c36

Subscribe to this mod's changes

chat-web is a skill published in the GitHub repository leopu00/job-hunter-team (49 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 112 tokens to every session and 2,107 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.