OpenClaw Master Skills is a curated, regularly updated collection of skills that extends an AI personal assistant platform with capabilities such as research, browser automation, presentation creation, and prompt work. It is intended for people using OpenClaw or MyClaw.ai to give their agents additional tasks and workflows. The catalogue contains many skills and agents from this collection.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills --skill ai-prompt-engineering-safety-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leoyeai/openclaw-master-skills/ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leoyeai/openclaw-master-skills/ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leoyeai/openclaw-master-skills/ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leoyeai/openclaw-master-skills/ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leoyeai/openclaw-master-skills/ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.02166 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.01083 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00433 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00217 |
Grade A, and why
ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 231 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AI Prompt Engineering Safety Review & Improvement
You are an expert AI prompt engineer and safety specialist with deep expertise in responsible AI development, bias detection, security analysis, and prompt optimization. Your task is to conduct comprehensive analysis, review, and improvement of prompts for safety, bias, security, and effectiveness. Follow the comprehensive best practices outlined in the AI Prompt Engineering & Safety Best Practices instruction.
Your Mission
Analyze the provided prompt using systematic evaluation frameworks and provide detailed recommendations for improvement. Focus on safety, bias mitigation, security, and responsible AI usage while maintaining effectiveness. Provide educational insights and actionable guidance for prompt engineering best practices.
Analysis Framework
1. Safety Assessment
- Harmful Content Risk: Could this prompt generate harmful, dangerous, or inappropriate content?
- Violence & Hate Speech: Could the output promote violence, hate speech, or discrimination?
- Misinformation Risk: Could the output spread false or misleading information?
- Illegal Activities: Could the output promote illegal activities or cause personal harm?
2. Bias Detection & Mitigation
- Gender Bias: Does the prompt assume or reinforce gender stereotypes?
- Racial Bias: Does the prompt assume or reinforce racial stereotypes?
- Cultural Bias: Does the prompt assume or reinforce cultural stereotypes?
- Socioeconomic Bias: Does the prompt assume or reinforce socioeconomic stereotypes?
- Ability Bias: Does the prompt assume or reinforce ability-based stereotypes?
3. Security & Privacy Assessment
- Data Exposure: Could the prompt expose sensitive or personal data?
- Prompt Injection: Is the prompt vulnerable to injection attacks?
- Information Leakage: Could the prompt leak system or model information?
- Access Control: Does the prompt respect appropriate access controls?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 231 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 8ff9d227e96f
ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills (2,141 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 2,166 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
prompt-engineer
Prompt engineering expert for chain-of-thought, few-shot learning, evaluation, and LLM optimization.
langgraph
Build multi-agent AI systems with LangGraph — the low-level orchestration framework for stateful, graph-based agent workflows. Covers supervisor, swarm, and hierarchical multi-agent patterns; subgraph composition; state management (checkpointers/stores); persistence; evals; and production debugging. Reach for this…
dspy
Optimize and build programmatic prompt systems with Stanford DSPy. Signatures, modules (Predict, ChainOfThought, ReAct), optimizer/teleprompter selection, compilation, caching, evaluation. Use when doing programmatic prompt optimization or building compiled prompt programs. Do not use this skill for unrelated…
langchain
Build LLM applications with LangChain. Use when working with LangChain or comparing LLM application frameworks. Do not use this skill for unrelated requests; route to the nearest named specialist.
image-prompt-optimizer
A skill focused on improving prompts for image-generation tools, with instructions covering its goals, process, outputs, and operating modes.
metodo-3w1h
Dê a habilidade para agentes de IA de estruturar e otimizar prompts de imagens utilizando rigorosamente o método 3W1H (Who, What, Where, How) criado pelo Mário Lúcio. Utilize esta skill sempre que o usuário mencionar termos como 'gerar imagem', 'criar prompt de imagem', 'engenharia de prompt de imagem', 'fotorrealismo…