ring:dispatching-workflows

A multi-agent workflow for executing a phased development plan. It expands each phase into tasks, has agents implement them, and includes review and a skeptical second check before work is accepted.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to execute an existing phased plan, coordinate several implementation tasks, run testing and review inside each phase, and correct course between phases.
Why use it?
It adds structured verification to work spread across several phases or subsystems. Unverified work is held back so errors or overlooked risks can be addressed before moving on.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/lerianstudio/ring/dispatching-workflows
Any agent
npx skills add LerianStudio/ring --skill dispatching-workflows
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LerianStudio/ring

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 142 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,156 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00142 $0.03156
Opus 5 $0.00071 $0.01578
Sonnet 5 $0.00028 $0.00631
Haiku 4.5 $0.00014 $0.00316

Measured 2d ago against content hash faed759b45bd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ring:dispatching-workflows scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

default/skills/dispatching-workflows/SKILL.md · 181 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 181 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Dispatching Workflows

When to use

  • A phased plan exists (typically from ring:writing-plans) and you want each phase executed by a multi-agent harness, not a single subagent
  • You want review and an adversarial contrarian pass baked inside every wave — verified work returns, unverified work does not
  • Work benefits from phase checkpoints and supervisor course-correction between phases

Skip when

  • One supervised subagent per wave is enough → ring:executing-plans (lighter; the supervisor reviews after the wave returns)
  • Production work needing the full gated specialist roster and Gate 0/8/9 → ring:running-dev-cycle
  • No plan exists yet → ring:writing-plans first
  • Plan covers multiple independent subsystems → split into separate plans before executing

Sequence

Runs after: ring:writing-plans (consumes and updates its living plan document) Alternatives: ring:executing-plans (one supervised subagent per wave — lighter), ring:running-dev-cycle (full gated specialist cycle — heavier)

Companion skills: ring:writing-plans (Task Format + phase-epic-task hierarchy used during elaboration), ring:test-driven-development (RED→GREEN per task, inside the harness), ring:committing-changes (closes each task with a signed atomic commit), ring:reviewing-code (the full 9+ reviewer pool — run it at plan close or for a high-stakes phase)


The loop: elaborate the current phase into tasks against the real landed code → launch the phase as one workflow that implements, reviews, and contrarian-verifies internally → the workflow returns verified work → review it as supervisor → phase checkpoint → roll to the next phase → repeat. The main agent stays the supervisor; the workflow is a multi-agent harness, not a lone implementer. The plan document is the living source of truth — elaboration writes tasks back into it.

Announce at start: "Using ring:dispatching-workflows to execute this plan phase-by-phase as reviewed multi-agent workflows."

Read the full file on GitHub · 181 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 181 lines · 142 tokens per session scan A faed759b45bd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ring:dispatching-workflows is a skill published in the GitHub repository LerianStudio/ring (210 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 142 tokens to every session and 3,156 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.