ln-32-test-strategy-planner

ln-32-test-strategy-planner is a skill for Claude Code from levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills. It costs 25 tokens per session (2,577 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only workflow for designing a risk-based set of software tests and the evidence needed to accept a change. It decides which checks provide distinct confidence without writing or running tests.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to plan tests for affected behavior, decide what evidence to retain or remove, and document deliberate gaps.
Why use it?
It helps avoid both missing important defects and accumulating tests that repeat the same check without adding useful evidence.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the delivery-planning-suite plugin — 3 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to plan tests for affected behavior, decide what evidence to retain or remove, and document deliberate gaps.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/ln-32-test-strategy-planner
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-32-test-strategy-planner
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install delivery-planning-suite, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 3 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ln-32-test-strategy-planner

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/ln-32-test-strategy-planner/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/ln-32-test-strategy-planner)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/ln-32-test-strategy-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/ln-32-test-strategy-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ln-32-test-strategy-planner

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/ln-32-test-strategy-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/ln-32-test-strategy-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 25 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,577 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00025 $0.02577
Opus 5.5 $0.00010 $0.01031
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00005 $0.00515
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00258

Measured 7d ago against content hash a294ab7a1a40, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ln-32-test-strategy-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/delivery-planning-suite/skills/ln-32-test-strategy-planner/SKILL.md · 105 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Test Strategy Planner

Goal: Design a read-only, risk-based test portfolio decision for the requested scope. Maximize confidence in important local behavior while preventing test growth that lacks a unique defect signal, and define how affected evidence is retained, changed, consolidated, retired, or deliberately omitted.

Execution contract: The checklist defines completion. Track each item internally as PENDING, PROVEN with evidence, CLEARED with evidence its condition is absent, or UNPROVEN with a gap; reading, delegation, tool failure, a zero exit status, or a self-reported success is not proof; only the observed outcome is. Reconcile after each section. Before returning, resolve all PENDING, count only PROVEN and CLEARED, and apply verdict and approval rules to every gap. Preserve intent, scope, and existing authorization. Continue authorized work; ask only for consequential unresolved choices or required external approval. When no one can answer during the run, state the exact question and apply the skill's verdict for the remaining gap instead of waiting or guessing. Scale depth to material risk without skipping checks. Preserve dependency and safety order; otherwise choose an appropriate verification method. Accept equivalent user or repository evidence; no other skill, named artifact, or complete lifecycle is required. Preserve source requirement and decision IDs. Bind reused evidence to relevant source versions, dirty changes, configuration, and environment; invalidate only affected claims. On continuation, reconcile task, authorization, current state, and unresolved evidence. For long work, return a compact continuation record or update an already authorized artifact; read-only skills do not persist it. Distinguish artifact readiness, verified behavior, and external-action authority. Prepare authorized work before required approval. If blocked by an instruction, cite its exact source and unresolved boundary; do not invent approval gates from caution.

Read the full file on GitHub · 105 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago Changed a294ab7a1a40
  2. 23d ago Changed · -2 lines 3563e8b89ba4
  3. 27d ago First seen · 107 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A ef8b2d6a5f22

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ln-32-test-strategy-planner is a skill published in the GitHub repository levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills (573 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 2,577 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-13.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

semgrep-rule-variant-creator

Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.

waybarrios/opencode-power-pack · 50 tokens

verify-implementation

A workflow that runs a project’s verification skills to produce a report on coding patterns, architecture rules, and project conventions. It is intended for work after implementation, before a pull request, or during code review.

sangrokjung/claude-forge · 37 tokens

test-audit

Audit test suites for T1-T4 violations using AST analysis, mock detection, and multi-stage synthesis. Invoke when user asks to audit tests, check test quality, find mock violations, review test effectiveness, or inspect test suites for over-mocking. Triggers automatic rewrites when quality gates fail.

QBall-Inc/the-bulwark · 0 tokens

journey-simulation

Use when caller wants to observe how a stranger encounters a flow, artifact, or sandbox — triggers like "simulate a user journey", "test our onboarding / checkout / signup", "will my ICP convert", "how does a cold reader experience this README", "first-time user test", "cognitive walkthrough", or any request to…

RockyHong/super-bootstrap · 79 tokens

review-agents

Use for PR review, test runs, or dependency audits with the shipped specialist agents.

alexmond/alexmskills · 21 tokens

pr-test-analyzer

Reviews pull-request test coverage for critical gaps, edge cases, and brittle implementation-coupled tests. Prioritises behavioral coverage over line coverage and rates each finding 1-10 by criticality. Use when reviewing PRs that add or modify functionality and you want to assess whether the accompanying tests are…

jasmedia/cc-pr-reviewer · 67 tokens