pstack-claude is a set of opinionated coding-agent skills and workflows ported from Cursor to Claude Code, Codex, Pi, and other agent harnesses. It guides agents toward concise, simple, and verified code by routing goals to suitable workflows and supporting subagent tools. The catalogue entries are the project's skills, agents, hook, and plugin implementations for these agent environments.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add michael-denyer/pstack-claude --skill no-commentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/michael-denyer/pstack-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/michael-denyer/pstack-claude/no-comments)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/michael-denyer/pstack-claude/no-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/michael-denyer/pstack-claude/no-comments/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/michael-denyer/pstack-claude/no-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/michael-denyer/pstack-claude/no-comments.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00663 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00265 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00133 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
no-comments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- no-comments — 94% identical, 8 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 28 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
No comments
On Codex, read the platform mapping, including its per-skill notes, before following this skill.
On GitHub Copilot, read the platform mapping, including its per-skill notes, before following this skill.
Spawn comment-sicko. Act on accepted findings.
Defer to comment-sicko's fresh perspective.
Scope
Use the caller's files or diff. Otherwise use the current diff against the base branch, default main, including the working tree.
Steps
- Spawn
Agentwithsubagent_type: "pstack:comment-sicko". Pass the scope. Pick each subagent's reasoning level for the job, per the Subagents section of the poteto-mode skill. Do not restate its rules. - Inspect its report and diff. Reject application-code edits, scope escapes, exception-protected deletions, misstated
MUST KILLreasons, and flags that treat kept intentional code as guilty. Reshape flags on our-code surprises stay actionable. Do not restore those comments. A keep survives only with proof it is about something we cannot change. Audit missed scoped lint and TypeScript suppressions. Correctness or safety suppressions stay actionableMUST KILLs. Restore deletions only with exact exceptions and scoped proof. Before accepting thinIMPORTANTordo not removekills or keeps, run/howor/whyon their symbol. If a kill is ambiguous, do not restore. If a keep is refuted or still ambiguous, delete it. Revert and rerun one rejected report with the failure named. Reject a second, report it open, and fail/no-comments. - Fix trivial accepted flags directly by deleting a dead path, dropping a parameter, or using the real API. If any fix needs a shape, run
/architectonce for the accepted set and surrounding code. Stop at the sketch. Architect shapes. Step 4 implements. - Implement the smallest root-cause fix in scope. Remove every named workaround. If the root cause is out of scope, land the smallest in-scope fix and report the rest open. The principle-fix-root-causes and principle-redesign-from-first-principles skills guide intent only. Neither authorizes widening the fence nor fixing instances outside it. Never bolt on symptom guards.
- Constraint comments say
do not remove,do not change wording, ortalk to X before changing. Leave keeps about things we cannot change. Offer the cheapest in-scope type, runtime, test, or CI lint. Wait for interactive approval. Unattended and eval require caller pre-approval. If approved, encode then delete. Otherwise delete, report the constraint open, and sketch out-of-scope work. - Report the deletion count, restored comments, reruns, architect sketch, fixes, encoding offers, encodings, unenforced constraints, and other open work.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed 0130f65a93b3
- 7d ago Changed 7cdb5d46d9e0
- 14d ago Changed · +2 lines 2883e935b466
- 1mo ago Changed · -1 lines 6de3c00a2a77
- 1mo ago Changed 7040795b010c
- 1mo ago First seen · 27 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 95ebc8042864
no-comments is a skill published in the GitHub repository michael-denyer/pstack-claude (3,082 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 663 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-excellence
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
multi-reviewer-patterns
Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions with finding deduplication, severity calibration, and consolidated reporting. Use this skill when organizing multi-reviewer code reviews, calibrating finding severity, or consolidating review results.
ln-33-plan-reviewer
Reviews a concrete implementation plan for missing decisions, feasibility and risk before execution; read-only.
ln-52-delivery-reviewer
Reviews a completed change for acceptance, regressions and release risk; read-only, not a whole-codebase audit.
ln-41-surgical-change-implementer
Implements one scoped product feature or fix using existing contracts; not upgrades, performance tuning or establishing cross-cutting technical foundations.
ln-42-dependency-upgrader
Upgrades dependencies in reversible batches with version-specific compatibility and regression checks.