verify-findings

verify-findings is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from closedloop-ai/claude-plugins. It costs 171 tokens per session (1,695 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A code-review step that sends each reported issue to a separate checker trained to look for evidence that the issue is wrong.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps verify findings in local or GitHub-based code-review workflows, using separate checker tasks for each eligible finding.
Why use it?
It reduces false alarms by giving findings an independent challenge before they are shown as verified. It also records rejected findings so people can review those decisions.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Part of the code-review plugin — 5 skills, 4 commands, 2 agents shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/verify-findings
Any agent
npx skills add closedloop-ai/claude-plugins --skill verify-findings
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install code-review, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 5 skills, 4 commands, 2 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for verify-findings

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/verify-findings.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/verify-findings)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/verify-findings"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/verify-findings.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 171 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,695 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00171 $0.01695
Opus 5 $0.00086 $0.00847
Sonnet 5 $0.00034 $0.00339
Haiku 4.5 $0.00017 $0.00169

Measured 4d ago against content hash 499dee069f3b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

verify-findings scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/code-review/skills/verify-findings/SKILL.md · 71 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Finding-Verifier Fleet Dispatch (stage_23_verify_findings)

This skill is the canonical finding-verifier dispatcher for /code-review at stage_23_verify_findings. It is split out of commands/start.md so the orchestration spine stays lean; the orchestrator invokes it when the walker reaches stage_23_verify_findings. The content below is authoritative for both MODE=local and MODE=github, with mode-specific Task scheduling: GitHub mode dispatches verifiers synchronously, while local mode preserves parallel background dispatch plus blocking TaskOutput collection.


Verifier Fleet (stage_23_verify_findings)

This stage runs when the walker reaches stage_23. It implements PLN-722's finding-verification pass: each eligible finding gets an independent second opinion from a verifier agent prompted to falsify (not confirm) the original claim. Findings that survive land in verified[]; findings rejected with positive evidence land in rejected[] and surface in the "Dismissed Findings" section so humans can falsify the dismissal.

Inputs

stage_22b_verify_prepare already wrote <CR_DIR>/verify_manifest.json and one input file per eligible finding at <CR_DIR>/verifier_inputs/<finding_id>.json. Read the manifest:

{
  "to_verify": [{"finding_id", "model", "input_path", "output_path", ...}, ...],
  "skipped_no_verification": [...],
  "deferred_budget": [...],
  "cache_hits": [...]
}

cache_hits[] entries have already been materialized at their output_path; do NOT respawn them. Only entries in to_verify[] need fleet dispatch.

Spawn contract

First branch on MODE. GitHub and local runs intentionally use different Task scheduling because GitHub headless mode cannot survive outstanding background verifiers after the assistant turn ends.

GitHub mode (MODE=github): dispatch synchronously. Spawn exactly one verifier at a time and wait for its Task response before spawning the next to_verify[] entry. Omit run_in_background or set run_in_background: false; never set it to true for GitHub verifiers. Do not use TaskOutput, watcher files, sleep loops, polling loops, or "wait for background task" turns in GitHub verifier dispatch. Each verifier must finish, write its verdict JSON to the manifest entry's output_path (<CR_DIR>/agent_verifier_<finding_id>.json), and return before the walker dispatches the next to_verify[] entry. When stage_23 completes in GitHub mode there must be no verifier task still running.

Read the full file on GitHub · 71 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 71 lines · 171 tokens per session scan A 499dee069f3b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

verify-findings is a skill published in the GitHub repository closedloop-ai/claude-plugins (103 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 171 tokens to every session and 1,695 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

mcporter

List, auth, and call MCP servers/tools from the terminal.

NousResearch/hermes-agent · 16 tokens

article-writing

Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.

affaan-m/ECC · 57 tokens

mem0-oss-to-platform

Plan and then execute a migration of a project from the mem0 open-source / self-hosted SDK (the local Memory class) to the mem0 Platform / hosted / managed SDK (the MemoryClient class). Use this whenever a developer wants to move, switch, or migrate their mem0 usage off OSS/self-hosted to the hosted API — e.g.…

mem0ai/mem0 · 273 tokens

complete-partial-pr

Evaluate and complete an issue or PR where the submitted patch fixes only a narrow symptom of the reported pain point. Use when a contribution may miss adjacent integration surfaces, provider/spec semantics, roundtrip behavior, tests, docs, or historical maintainer decisions.

pydantic/pydantic-ai · 55 tokens

deploy-docker-compose

Run the Omnigent server as a Docker compose stack (server + Postgres) on any Docker host — your laptop, a VPS, EC2 by hand, or as the base layer of any container-platform deploy. Invoke when the user wants to build the image, bring up the compose stack, debug the stack on a host they already have, or extend the stack…

omnigent-ai/omnigent · 84 tokens

mapping-to-snomed

Maps clinical concept spans extracted by OpenMed to SNOMED CT concepts through a USER-SUPPLIED terminology server (the user's own Ontoserver, Snowstorm, or UMLS/UTS), never a bundled vocabulary. Use when the user wants to code findings, disorders, procedures, body structures, or substances to SNOMED CT, run an ECL…

maziyarpanahi/openmed · 205 tokens