Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/verify-findingsnpx skills add closedloop-ai/claude-plugins --skill verify-findingsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/closedloop-ai/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/verify-findings)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/verify-findings"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/verify-findings.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00171 | $0.01695 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00086 | $0.00847 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00339 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00169 |
Grade A, and why
verify-findings scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Finding-Verifier Fleet Dispatch (stage_23_verify_findings)
This skill is the canonical finding-verifier dispatcher for /code-review at stage_23_verify_findings. It is split out of commands/start.md so the orchestration spine stays lean; the orchestrator invokes it when the walker reaches stage_23_verify_findings. The content below is authoritative for both MODE=local and MODE=github, with mode-specific Task scheduling: GitHub mode dispatches verifiers synchronously, while local mode preserves parallel background dispatch plus blocking TaskOutput collection.
Verifier Fleet (stage_23_verify_findings)
This stage runs when the walker reaches stage_23. It implements PLN-722's finding-verification pass: each eligible finding gets an independent second opinion from a verifier agent prompted to falsify (not confirm) the original claim. Findings that survive land in verified[]; findings rejected with positive evidence land in rejected[] and surface in the "Dismissed Findings" section so humans can falsify the dismissal.
Inputs
stage_22b_verify_prepare already wrote <CR_DIR>/verify_manifest.json and one input file per eligible finding at <CR_DIR>/verifier_inputs/<finding_id>.json. Read the manifest:
{
"to_verify": [{"finding_id", "model", "input_path", "output_path", ...}, ...],
"skipped_no_verification": [...],
"deferred_budget": [...],
"cache_hits": [...]
}
cache_hits[] entries have already been materialized at their output_path; do NOT respawn them. Only entries in to_verify[] need fleet dispatch.
Spawn contract
First branch on MODE. GitHub and local runs intentionally use different Task scheduling because GitHub headless mode cannot survive outstanding background verifiers after the assistant turn ends.
GitHub mode (MODE=github): dispatch synchronously. Spawn exactly one verifier at a time and wait for its Task response before spawning the next to_verify[] entry. Omit run_in_background or set run_in_background: false; never set it to true for GitHub verifiers. Do not use TaskOutput, watcher files, sleep loops, polling loops, or "wait for background task" turns in GitHub verifier dispatch. Each verifier must finish, write its verdict JSON to the manifest entry's output_path (<CR_DIR>/agent_verifier_<finding_id>.json), and return before the walker dispatches the next to_verify[] entry. When stage_23 completes in GitHub mode there must be no verifier task still running.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 71 lines · 171 tokens per session scan A 499dee069f3b
verify-findings is a skill published in the GitHub repository closedloop-ai/claude-plugins (103 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 171 tokens to every session and 1,695 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
mcporter
List, auth, and call MCP servers/tools from the terminal.
article-writing
Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.
mem0-oss-to-platform
Plan and then execute a migration of a project from the mem0 open-source / self-hosted SDK (the local Memory class) to the mem0 Platform / hosted / managed SDK (the MemoryClient class). Use this whenever a developer wants to move, switch, or migrate their mem0 usage off OSS/self-hosted to the hosted API — e.g.…
complete-partial-pr
Evaluate and complete an issue or PR where the submitted patch fixes only a narrow symptom of the reported pain point. Use when a contribution may miss adjacent integration surfaces, provider/spec semantics, roundtrip behavior, tests, docs, or historical maintainer decisions.
deploy-docker-compose
Run the Omnigent server as a Docker compose stack (server + Postgres) on any Docker host — your laptop, a VPS, EC2 by hand, or as the base layer of any container-platform deploy. Invoke when the user wants to build the image, bring up the compose stack, debug the stack on a host they already have, or extend the stack…
mapping-to-snomed
Maps clinical concept spans extracted by OpenMed to SNOMED CT concepts through a USER-SUPPLIED terminology server (the user's own Ontoserver, Snowstorm, or UMLS/UTS), never a bundled vocabulary. Use when the user wants to code findings, disorders, procedures, body structures, or substances to SNOMED CT, run an ECL…