Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-42-dependency-upgradergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/ln-42-dependency-upgrader)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/ln-42-dependency-upgrader"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/ln-42-dependency-upgrader/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/ln-42-dependency-upgrader"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/ln-42-dependency-upgrader.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.02677 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.01071 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00535 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00268 |
Grade A, and why
ln-42-dependency-upgrader scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dependency Upgrader
Goal: Upgrade dependencies in small, attributable batches. Preserve manifests, lockfiles, runtime support, and product behavior; do not treat a newer version as valuable without compatibility, security, or maintenance evidence.
Execution contract: The checklist defines completion. Track each item internally as PENDING, PROVEN with evidence, CLEARED with evidence its condition is absent, or UNPROVEN with a gap; reading, delegation, tool failure, a zero exit status, or a self-reported success is not proof; only the observed outcome is. Reconcile after each section. Before returning, resolve all PENDING, count only PROVEN and CLEARED, and apply verdict and approval rules to every gap.
Preserve intent, scope, and existing authorization. Continue authorized work; ask only for consequential unresolved choices or required external approval. When no one can answer during the run, state the exact question and apply the skill's verdict for the remaining gap instead of waiting or guessing. Scale depth to material risk without skipping checks. Preserve dependency and safety order; otherwise choose an appropriate verification method.
Accept equivalent user or repository evidence; no other skill, named artifact, or complete lifecycle is required. Preserve source requirement and decision IDs. Bind reused evidence to relevant source versions, dirty changes, configuration, and environment; invalidate only affected claims.
On continuation, reconcile task, authorization, current state, and unresolved evidence. For long work, return a compact continuation record or update an already authorized artifact; read-only skills do not persist it. Distinguish artifact readiness, verified behavior, and external-action authority.
Prepare authorized work before required approval. If blocked by an instruction, cite its exact source and unresolved boundary; do not invent approval gates from caution.
Tool Routing
| Need | Preferred tool | Use it when | Fallback |
|---|---|---|---|
| Package-manager detection | Manifests, lockfiles, workspace files, runtime files, and repository instructions | Always before choosing commands or update scope | Build and CI configuration |
| Outdated and vulnerable packages | Native package-manager outdated and audit commands | The manager and registry are available | Official registry, vendor advisory, and lockfile inspection |
| Breaking changes and support | Official release notes, migration guides, changelogs, advisories, and runtime support tables | Every consequential minor, major, replacement, or security update | Primary-source repository releases; otherwise mark UNVERIFIED |
| Usage and blast radius | Language server or host-native code intelligence | An updated API, type, plugin, build tool, or runtime may affect consumers | Targeted import, symbol, configuration, and script search |
| Safe version changes | Native package-manager commands | Updating manifests and generated lock state | Do not hand-edit lockfiles or emulate package resolution |
| Verification | Repository-defined install, restore, build, lint, type, test, migration, and smoke commands | Before changes and after each batch | CI and script inspection with explicit unverified status |
| Diff and rollback | Git status, diff, and isolated commits or worktree | Protecting user changes and reverting only the failed batch | Stop if the batch cannot be isolated safely |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed 687d084e4567
- 23d ago Changed 61aecb2673eb
- 27d ago First seen · 115 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A efcad4bfe1d7
ln-42-dependency-upgrader is a skill published in the GitHub repository levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills (573 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 2,677 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-13.
Other skills, from other repositories
semgrep-rule-variant-creator
Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.
verify-implementation
A workflow that runs a project’s verification skills to produce a report on coding patterns, architecture rules, and project conventions. It is intended for work after implementation, before a pull request, or during code review.
test-audit
Audit test suites for T1-T4 violations using AST analysis, mock detection, and multi-stage synthesis. Invoke when user asks to audit tests, check test quality, find mock violations, review test effectiveness, or inspect test suites for over-mocking. Triggers automatic rewrites when quality gates fail.
journey-simulation
Use when caller wants to observe how a stranger encounters a flow, artifact, or sandbox — triggers like "simulate a user journey", "test our onboarding / checkout / signup", "will my ICP convert", "how does a cold reader experience this README", "first-time user test", "cognitive walkthrough", or any request to…
review-agents
Use for PR review, test runs, or dependency audits with the shipped specialist agents.
pr-test-analyzer
Reviews pull-request test coverage for critical gaps, edge cases, and brittle implementation-coupled tests. Prioritises behavioral coverage over line coverage and rates each finding 1-10 by criticality. Use when reviewing PRs that add or modify functionality and you want to assess whether the accompanying tests are…