World of ClaudeCraft is a browser-based classic-style multiplayer online game with a persistent shared world that can also run locally or be controlled through a Python reinforcement-learning interface. Players can quest and raid in the online world, while developers can host it themselves and train AI agents to play. The catalogue skills, agents, instructions, hooks, and setting support workflows for interacting with and developing the game.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to levy-street/world-of-claudecraft. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/levy-street/world-of-claudecraft/main/.agents/skills/woc-review-pr/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/levy-street/world-of-claudecraftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/levy-street/world-of-claudecraft/woc-review-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/levy-street/world-of-claudecraft/woc-review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/levy-street/world-of-claudecraft/woc-review-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/levy-street/world-of-claudecraft/woc-review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/levy-street/world-of-claudecraft/woc-review-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.00521 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00260 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00104 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
woc-review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Pull Request
Perform a read-only, evidence-backed review of the requested pull request.
Hold the authorization boundary
A request to review, inspect, check, or assess authorizes reading and drafting only. Do
not run gh pr review, post a comment, approve, request changes, push, edit the branch,
or otherwise write to GitHub unless the user explicitly asks to submit the review.
Establish scope
- Read the root
CLAUDE.mdin full. - Identify the pull request, repository, head, base, and merge base.
- Read local
CLAUDE.mdfiles for touched directories. - Inspect the actual diff, surrounding production code, and linked acceptance criteria.
- Run
git status --shortand avoid disturbing unrelated work.
Use read-only Git and GitHub inspection as needed. Do not rely on the PR description.
Review and verify
Check correctness, edge cases, canonical architecture, determinism, parity, persistence, security, authorization, localization, generated artifacts, decisive tests, and updated operator documentation wherever those domains apply.
The coordinating agent runs targeted commands once. Specialist reviewers inspect the diff and shared results without duplicating the full test or build run.
Invoke woc_database_performance when the diff changes SQL, a database call site,
schema or indexes, query frequency/cardinality, pool or lock behavior, timeout policy,
background database work, database driver/dependency versions, PostgreSQL
engine/resource/configuration/topology, or stored-data growth. Pair it with persistence or security
review when those concerns also apply.
For every candidate finding:
- Trace the execution path.
- Confirm the PR introduces or exposes it.
- Check existing tests and guards.
- Identify concrete impact.
- Cite the narrowest useful file and line.
- Remove speculative, duplicate, inherited, and style-only noise.
Classify findings as blocking, should fix, or suggestion. Deliver confirmed findings first, followed by test gaps and residual risk.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 56 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A b958f04c641f
woc-review-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository levy-street/world-of-claudecraft (2,251 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 521 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…