Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lgbarn/shipyard --skill infrastructure-validationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lgbarn/shipyardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lgbarn/shipyard/infrastructure-validation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lgbarn/shipyard/infrastructure-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lgbarn/shipyard/infrastructure-validation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lgbarn/shipyard/infrastructure-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lgbarn/shipyard/infrastructure-validation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Prompt Injection · line 6 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 120 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00094 | $0.01445 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00578 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00289 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00145 |
Grade A, and why
infrastructure-validation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 162 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Infrastructure Validation
Activation Triggers
- Files matching:
*.tf,*.tfvars,Dockerfile,docker-compose.yml,playbook*.yml,roles/,inventory/ - Config:
.shipyard/config.jsonhasiac_validationset to"auto"ortrue - Templates with
AWSTemplateFormatVersion(CloudFormation) - YAML with
apiVersion:(Kubernetes)
Natural Language Triggers
- "validate terraform", "check docker", "lint ansible", "IaC validation", "infrastructure check"
Overview
IaC mistakes don't cause test failures -- they cause outages, breaches, and cost overruns. Validate before every change.
Core principle: Never apply without plan review. Like TDD requires tests before code, IaC requires validation before apply.
Terraform Workflow
Run in order. Each step must pass before proceeding.
terraform fmt -check # 1. Format (auto-fix with fmt if needed)
terraform validate # 2. Syntax validation
terraform plan -out=tfplan # 3. Review every change -- NEVER skip
tflint --recursive # 4. Lint (if installed)
tfsec . OR checkov -d . # 5. Security scan (if installed)
Drift detection: terraform plan -detailed-exitcode -- exit code 2 means drift. Document what drifted and why before overwriting.
Ansible Workflow
yamllint . # 1. YAML syntax
ansible-lint # 2. Best practices
ansible-playbook --syntax-check *.yml # 3. Playbook syntax
ansible-playbook --check *.yml # 4. Dry run (where supported)
molecule test # 5. Role tests (if configured)
Docker Workflow
hadolint Dockerfile # 1. Lint (if installed)
docker build -t test-build . # 2. Build
trivy image test-build # 3. Security scan (if installed)
docker compose config # 4. Validate compose (if applicable)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago Changed · -4 tokens per session e038cc96b5b7
- 1mo ago First seen · 162 lines · 98 tokens per session scan A 371f9af79271
infrastructure-validation is a skill published in the GitHub repository lgbarn/shipyard (65 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 1,445 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
stack-baseline
The pinned default technology stack for SMB Product-Builder products. One source of truth so the architect, app-scaffolder, auth-engineer, and senior-dev never re-decide the stack per build — they build ON it. Covers framework, ORM/DB, auth, UI, payments/email/SMS, files, jobs, testing, hosting, and observability…
deploy-landed
A deployment verification procedure that checks whether the intended code revision is actually running, its environment settings are present, and the product works. A deployment is the process of putting new software on a server or hosting platform.
runtime-security
Detect and respond to in-container threats at the syscall level using Falco (eBPF-based, CNCF, open-source, no license cost). Covers Falco installation on EKS/GKE with eBPF driver, custom rule authoring, alert routing via Falcosidekick, rule debugging, and bridging Falco runtime signals to Kyverno admission…
relay-deploy
Set up a complete deployment configuration — Dockerfile, deployment manifest, environment config, and rollback procedure. Use when asked about "deployment setup", "how do I deploy this", "deployment strategy", or "rollback plan".
ring:creating-helm-charts
Creating Helm charts to Lerian conventions via ring:helm: standardized chart structure, full env-var coverage from .env.example, security defaults (runAsNonRoot, readOnlyRootFilesystem), ClusterIP-only services, and health probes; validates helm lint and template render. Use when creating, modifying, or reviewing a…
deploy-mcp
Deploy the FutureSearch MCP server to staging or production on GKE. Use when the user wants to deploy, redeploy, roll back, scale replicas, or check deployment status. Triggers on deploy, redeploy, staging, production, rollout, scale, replicas.