Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lhbsaa/embedded-dev-skill --skill embedded-implementationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lhbsaa/embedded-dev-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lhbsaa/embedded-dev-skill/embedded-implementation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lhbsaa/embedded-dev-skill/embedded-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lhbsaa/embedded-dev-skill/embedded-implementation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lhbsaa/embedded-dev-skill/embedded-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lhbsaa/embedded-dev-skill/embedded-implementation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00921 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00368 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00184 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
embedded-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 163 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Embedded Implementation
Overview
Execute implementation plan with two-stage review after each task.
Core principle: Fresh subagent per task + hardware validation + code quality review = high quality.
Context: Run after embedded-driver-design creates plan.
Two-Stage Review Process
Task Execution → Hardware Validator → Code Quality Reviewer → Commit
↓ ↓ ↓
Generate code DMA/GPIO check MISRA C check
Stage 1: Hardware Validator
- Use
prompts/hardware-validator.md - Checks: DMA <= 4092, interface config, init sequence
Stage 2: Code Quality Reviewer
- Use
prompts/code-quality.md - Checks: MISRA C, DRY, YAGNI, clean code
Process
1. Load Plan
read docs/embedded/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<driver>-plan.md
Extract ALL tasks with full text and context.
2. Create Todo List
todowrite todos=[{task: "Task 1: Header file", status: "pending"}, ...]
3. Execute Per Task
For each task:
#### Task N Execution
1. Mark todo: in_progress
2. Get task text and context (already extracted)
3. Dispatch implementation (use prompts/driver-generator.md)
- Generate code
- Build verification
4. Stage 1 Review: Hardware Validator
- Use prompts/hardware-validator.md
- Check DMA, interface, init sequence
5. If Stage 1 FAILS:
- Fix issues
- Re-review
- Don't proceed until APPROVED
6. Stage 2 Review: Code Quality
- Use prompts/code-quality.md
- Check MISRA C, DRY, YAGNI
7. If Stage 2 FAILS:
- Fix issues
- Re-review
- Don't proceed until APPROVED
8. Both stages APPROVED:
- Mark todo: completed
- Commit changes
4. After All Tasks
Dispatch final review for entire implementation
5. Transition to Verification
All tasks complete. Invoking embedded-verification for build-flash-monitor loop.
REQUIRED: Invoke embedded-verification next.
Implementation Prompt
Use prompts/driver-generator.md for code generation:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 163 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 32e3a0ba8889
embedded-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository lhbsaa/embedded-dev-skill (10 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 921 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ruview-configure
Configure RuView — ESP32 sdkconfig variants, NVS provisioning, WiFi channel / MAC filter overrides (ADR-060), edge intelligence modules (ADR-041), sensing-server flags, multi-node mesh, and Cognitum Seed integration. Use when adjusting how a deployed RuView system behaves without changing code.
ruview-advanced-sensing
Advanced RuView capabilities — RuvSense multistatic sensing (attention-weighted fusion, geometric diversity, persistent field model), cross-viewpoint fusion across multiple nodes, RF tomography (ISTA L1 solver, voxel grids), longitudinal biomechanics drift, pre-movement intention signals, adversarial signal detection…
ruview-applications
Run RuView sensing applications — presence/occupancy, breathing & heart rate, activity & fall detection, 17-keypoint pose estimation (WiFlow), sleep monitoring & apnea screening, environment mapping, Mass Casualty Assessment (MAT), and the 3D point-cloud fusion demo. Use when someone wants to actually do something…
ruview-cli-api
Use the RuView wifi-densepose CLI binary (incl. MAT scan/status/zones/survivors/alerts/export subcommands), the REST API (wifi-densepose-api, Axum), and the browser/WASM build (wifi-densepose-wasm, wifi-densepose-wasm-edge). Use when integrating RuView into another program, scripting it from the shell, exposing it…
ruview-mmwave
Set up and run RuView mmWave / FMCW radar sensing — ESP32-C6 + Seeed MR60BHA2 (60 GHz, heart rate / breathing rate / presence) and HLK-LD2410 (24 GHz, presence + distance), plus mmWave↔WiFi-CSI sensor fusion (48-byte fused vitals, MR60BHA2/LD2410 auto-detect, v0.5.0+). Use when the deployment includes a…
ruview-quickstart
Onboarding and first-run for RuView (WiFi-DensePose) — Docker demo with simulated data, repo build, and the fastest path to a live sensing dashboard. Use when someone is new to RuView or wants the shortest path to "it works on my machine".