Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add li-ch/law-skills --skill law-resubmitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/li-ch/law-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/li-ch/law-skills/law-resubmit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/li-ch/law-skills/law-resubmit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/li-ch/law-skills/law-resubmit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/li-ch/law-skills/law-resubmit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/li-ch/law-skills/law-resubmit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00482 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00193 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
law-resubmit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
LAW Resubmit
Prepare a paper for resubmission to a new venue. Copies the repo, swaps templates, archives old artifacts, and continues git history.
Workflow
Step 1: Gather parameters
Ask the user for:
- New venue (
nsdi,sp(IEEE S&P),sigcomm,apnet,arxiv) - New year
- New cycle (optional)
Same interactive prompt flow as law-bootstrap.
Step 2: Run resubmit script
bash scripts/resubmit.sh --venue <venue> --year <year> [--cycle <cycle>]
The script:
- Copies the entire paper repo to
{name}-{new-venue}-{new-year}[-{new-cycle}] - Swaps document class, style files, and citation style for the new venue
- Updates
AGENTS.mdwith the new venue name - Strips venue-specific formatting (e.g., ACM copyright block → remove for arxiv submission)
- Moves old timestamped PDFs (
main-*.pdf) toarchive/ - Moves old
reviews/contents toarchive/ - Commits:
git add -A && git commit -m "resubmit: switch venue to {new-venue} {new-year}"
Step 3: Safety checks
- If the target directory already exists: warn and ask for confirmation
- If the new venue is the same as the old venue: warn (should use a different cycle/year)
- Never delete the original paper repo — only copy and modify the copy
What gets archived
Only main-*.pdf files and reviews/ contents go to archive/. Everything else is overwritten in-place in the new repo.
What stays the same
- All section content (
sections/*.tex) - All figures (
figs/*) - All data (
data/*) - Paper narrative in
CLAUDE.md - Git history continues (no fresh
git init)
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed 887d20cff83e
- 2mo ago First seen · 53 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 111be7c486e2
law-resubmit is a skill published in the GitHub repository li-ch/law-skills (11 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 482 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
law-resubmit compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| law-resubmitli-ch/law-skills | Skill | 11 | 9d ago | MIT | A | 54 | Claude Code, Codex |
| clinical-case-reportnexu-io/open-design | Skill | 106k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 73 | Claude Code, Codex |
| instrument-data-to-allotropeanthropics/knowledge-work-plugins | Skill | 35k | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 123 | Claude Code |
| pydicomK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code, Codex |
| nature-paper2wordYuan1z0825/nature-skills | Skill | 52k | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 233 | Codex |
| nature-paper-transYuan1z0825/nature-skills | Skill | 52k | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 68 | Codex |
| nature-experiment-logYuan1z0825/nature-skills | Skill | 52k | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 45 | Codex |