Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids --skill project-guidelines-writergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroidsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids/project-guidelines-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids/project-guidelines-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids/project-guidelines-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids/project-guidelines-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids/project-guidelines-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.02743 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.01097 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00549 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00274 |
Grade A, and why
project-guidelines-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 278 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Project Guidelines Writer Skill
Analyze a repository and generate or update a focused set of guideline documents without duplicating content across them.
Your job is to:
- understand the repository from a representative sample of files
- detect conventions, architecture, testing posture, and documentation gaps
- create missing guidelines with clear document boundaries
- preserve valid existing guidance and apply only necessary, evidence-backed deltas
Default path: read existing guidelines, investigate current repository evidence, create missing documents, patch only justified deltas, and leave unchanged files unwritten. Documents belong to the repository, not to their generator.
Standard Outputs
Review all six guideline documents by default unless the user explicitly skips named files.
AGENTS.mdCONTRIBUTING.mdSTYLEGUIDE.mdTESTING.mdARCHITECTURE.mdSECURITY.md
Missing files should be created automatically unless explicitly skipped. Reviewing an existing file and finding no necessary changes is a successful outcome, not a skipped file.
Workflow
Step 1: Repository Analysis
Select the files needed to understand the repository.
- Read any existing guideline files in full before proposing changes:
AGENTS.mdCONTRIBUTING.mdSTYLEGUIDE.mdTESTING.mdARCHITECTURE.mdSECURITY.md
- Select representative files across:
- configuration
- entry points
- source code
- tests and test config
- existing docs
- Prefer files that reveal structure, conventions, and workflows.
- Exclude historical
.specs/changes/<slug>/artifacts from repository discovery unless the user explicitly requests analysis of a specific artifact. They are not evidence of current behavior.
Use tools like:
Globto find representative filesReadto inspect themGrepto confirm naming, test, and architecture patterns
Keep concise internal notes of the existing guidelines and relevant evidence sources; do not create an extra analysis artifact or stop for confirmation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · -9 lines · +7 tokens per session 49f846024b93
- 1mo ago First seen · 287 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 1a46a2d1d5ff
project-guidelines-writer is a skill published in the GitHub repository lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids (54 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 2,743 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
artifact-conventions
Defines preservation, format, and section rules for SDD specification artifacts (spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, checklists). Use when editing feature-artifact files under specs/ / to prevent accidental corruption of cross-referenced IDs, priorities, and gating state.
plan-authoring
Reference material for writing implementation plans (technical context, architecture decisions, data models, API contracts, project-instructions alignment). Loaded on demand by plan-feature; not directly invokable.
task-generation
Reference material with the canonical task-format grammar and decomposition rules for plan-to-tasks expansion. Loaded on demand by generate-tasks; not directly invokable.
evidence-led-authoring
Shared bootstrap-owner contract for evidence-backed brownfield candidates, provenance, and imported baseline coverage.
adr-authoring
Defines the canonical MADR format, lifecycle rules, numbering policy, and SAD catalog contract for standalone ADRs under specs/adrs/.
markdown-compression
Safely compresses narrative Markdown using deterministic compaction plus validator checks. Only for allowlisted and gated artifacts.