project-guidelines-writer

project-guidelines-writer is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids. It costs 87 tokens per session (2,743 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A repository-documentation skill that analyzes a code project and creates or refreshes six guidance files: AGENTS.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, STYLEGUIDE.md, TESTING.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, and SECURITY.md.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when setting up project guidance, documenting an existing codebase, or refreshing outdated instructions. It preserves user-written content outside the sections it manages.
Why use it?
It turns the project’s actual conventions into organized documentation instead of leaving contributors to guess. It also avoids repeating the same information across multiple files.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions AGENTS.md.

Good fit Use it when setting up project guidance, documenting an existing codebase, or refreshing outdated instructions. It preserves user-written content outside the sections it manages.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids/project-guidelines-writer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids --skill project-guidelines-writer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for project-guidelines-writer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids/project-guidelines-writer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids/project-guidelines-writer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids/project-guidelines-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids/project-guidelines-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for project-guidelines-writer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids/project-guidelines-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids/project-guidelines-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 87 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,743 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00087 $0.02743
Opus 5.5 $0.00035 $0.01097
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00017 $0.00549
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00274

Measured yesterday against content hash 49f846024b93, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

project-guidelines-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

packages/cli/templates/universal/skills/project-guidelines-writer/SKILL.md · 278 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 278 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Project Guidelines Writer Skill

Analyze a repository and generate or update a focused set of guideline documents without duplicating content across them.

Your job is to:

  • understand the repository from a representative sample of files
  • detect conventions, architecture, testing posture, and documentation gaps
  • create missing guidelines with clear document boundaries
  • preserve valid existing guidance and apply only necessary, evidence-backed deltas

Default path: read existing guidelines, investigate current repository evidence, create missing documents, patch only justified deltas, and leave unchanged files unwritten. Documents belong to the repository, not to their generator.

Standard Outputs

Review all six guideline documents by default unless the user explicitly skips named files.

  • AGENTS.md
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
  • STYLEGUIDE.md
  • TESTING.md
  • ARCHITECTURE.md
  • SECURITY.md

Missing files should be created automatically unless explicitly skipped. Reviewing an existing file and finding no necessary changes is a successful outcome, not a skipped file.

Workflow

Step 1: Repository Analysis

Select the files needed to understand the repository.

  1. Read any existing guideline files in full before proposing changes:
    • AGENTS.md
    • CONTRIBUTING.md
    • STYLEGUIDE.md
    • TESTING.md
    • ARCHITECTURE.md
    • SECURITY.md
  2. Select representative files across:
    • configuration
    • entry points
    • source code
    • tests and test config
    • existing docs
  3. Prefer files that reveal structure, conventions, and workflows.
  4. Exclude historical .specs/changes/<slug>/ artifacts from repository discovery unless the user explicitly requests analysis of a specific artifact. They are not evidence of current behavior.

Use tools like:

  • Glob to find representative files
  • Read to inspect them
  • Grep to confirm naming, test, and architecture patterns

Keep concise internal notes of the existing guidelines and relevant evidence sources; do not create an extra analysis artifact or stop for confirmation.

Read the full file on GitHub · 278 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday Changed · -9 lines · +7 tokens per session 49f846024b93
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 287 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 1a46a2d1d5ff

Subscribe to this mod's changes

project-guidelines-writer is a skill published in the GitHub repository lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids (54 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 2,743 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.