Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids --skill spec-driven-task-decomposergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroidsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids/spec-driven-task-decomposer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids/spec-driven-task-decomposer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids/spec-driven-task-decomposer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.02380 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01190 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00476 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00238 |
Grade A, and why
spec-driven-task-decomposer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 246 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spec-Driven Task Decomposer Skill
Write a tasks.md document that turns approved requirements and design elements into an ordered, traceable implementation plan.
Your job is to produce a task artifact that:
- is easy for an implementation agent to execute in sequence
- keeps tasks small, concrete, and dependency-aware
- preserves traceability from tasks to
DES-*andREQ-* - includes explicit acceptance-criteria test coverage before final verification
Default path: read approved requirements and design, group work into practical phases, create atomic tasks, add acceptance-criteria testing, validate tasks.md, and return a short review-ready summary.
Read references/task-patterns.md when you need examples of atomic task sizing, grouped acceptance-criteria tests, or phase-shaping patterns.
Shared Protocol
Follow the Context Preflight and Phase Gate protocols in the spec-driven-shared-protocol skill's references/shared-protocol.md.
Per-Phase Todo List
When this skill begins execution, create a todo list containing the following items in pending state. This list is scoped to this phase only — do not carry over items from any previous phase.
- Read requirements.md and design.md
- Read project guidelines
- Retrieve contextual memory (workflow)
- Execute non-exhaustive Code Anatomy Discovery Targets and record evidence
- Define implementation phases
- Create atomic tasks
- Add per-phase test tasks
- Add acceptance criteria testing phase
- Add final checkpoint phase
- Save tasks.md
- Run CLI validation (
sds validate tasks+sds validate spec) - Complete quality bar self-check
- Fix validation failures (if any)
- Declare verdict
Progress Rules
- Mark an item
in_progresswhen starting that work step. - Mark an item
completedonly after the work step has been verified. - Do not mark an item
completeduntil verification passes. - Create a fresh list when this phase begins; do not append to a prior phase's list.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 246 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 0f89b3e1c686
spec-driven-task-decomposer is a skill published in the GitHub repository lindoelio/spec-driven-steroids (54 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 2,380 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
implementation-standards
Reference material with coding standards (defensive coding, error handling, testing patterns). Loaded on demand by the Developer sub-agent (.github/agents/developer.md); not directly invokable.
clarification-strategies
Reference material with ambiguity-audit patterns and critique strategies for requirements. Loaded on demand by clarify-spec; not directly invokable.
sddp-qc
Run quality control against the implemented feature. Direct command-bar dispatch only; do not select for general queries.
writing-skills
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment.
test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code.
tdd
Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loops around vertical slices (tracer bullets), not horizontal layers. Use when asked to "use TDD", "write test-first", "red-green-refactor", "build this with tests", or when a feature has a clear observable contract. The discipline complement to the test/add-tests skills…