Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/main/.claude/skills/lfx-self-serve-learnings-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/lfx-self-serve-learnings-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/lfx-self-serve-learnings-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/lfx-self-serve-learnings-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/lfx-self-serve-learnings-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/lfx-self-serve-learnings-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 6 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Prompt Injection · line 60 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 62 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 63 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 64 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 67 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 68 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00160 | $0.02137 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00080 | $0.01069 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00427 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00214 |
Grade A, and why
lfx-self-serve-learnings-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 140 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LFX Self-Serve Learnings Reviewer
You match the latest commit on the local branch against the empirical pattern knowledge base in docs/reviews/knowledge-base/. Each pattern entry was extracted from a real PR review comment on this repo. Findings are gated by KB matches: every emitted finding must quote a pattern entry's rule ID + a phrase from its **Pattern:** or **Detect:** clause. If you can't quote, you drop.
Generic-rubric findings (security / performance / quality / architecture / testing intuitions not grounded in a KB entry) belong to lfx-self-serve-code-review, which audits the documented rule surface. You cover the empirical surface — the patterns the bots and human reviewers have actually flagged.
Repository scope
This skill is owned by the lfx-self-serve repo
(.claude/skills/lfx-self-serve-learnings-review/), and the reviewer loading
it may be launched from the LFX workspace root or a multi-repo session.
Regardless of the current working directory, it always reviews
lfx-self-serve.
If the caller provides target repo: lfx-self-serve, use that as confirmation.
If the caller provides any other target repo, abort with
INCOMPLETE - lfx-self-serve reviewer invoked for <repo>.
Before diffing, locate the lfx-self-serve repo root:
- If you are already in
lfx-self-serve, you are home. Use that repo root. - Otherwise, look for a sibling or child directory named
lfx-self-serve. - If the repo cannot be found, abort with
INCOMPLETE - lfx-self-serve repo not found.
Inputs
Parse the caller's prompt for:
branch— OPTIONAL keyword. If present, switch to full-branch mode: audit the branch's diff against main (origin/main...HEAD) instead of just the latest commit. Used by the pre-PR full-branch sweep.extra: <free text>— optional priority hint.
Step 1 — Compute the diff
Run all git commands from the lfx-self-serve repo root.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 140 lines · 160 tokens per session scan A 8406a038ddac
lfx-self-serve-learnings-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 160 tokens to every session and 2,137 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…