dragoncraft-review

dragoncraft-review is a skill for Claude Code from lj22503/diaolong-skill. It costs 75 tokens per session (1,622 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of dragoncraft-art, MIT.

A Chinese-language review coach for turning project experiences, failures, and lessons into structured stories. It asks for the event, the result, the turning point, and the reasoning behind the decision.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to prepare a spoken review meeting script, a written project retrospective, or a list of what could have happened differently.
Why use it?
It helps avoid reviews that are only data, blame, or success claims by adding a clear conflict, reflection, and practical lesson.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it to prepare a spoken review meeting script, a written project retrospective, or a list of what could have happened differently.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/lj22503/diaolong-skill/narrative-retrospective
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add lj22503/diaolong-skill --skill narrative-retrospective
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lj22503/diaolong-skill

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for dragoncraft-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lj22503/diaolong-skill/narrative-retrospective/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lj22503/diaolong-skill/narrative-retrospective)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lj22503/diaolong-skill/narrative-retrospective"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lj22503/diaolong-skill/narrative-retrospective/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for dragoncraft-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lj22503/diaolong-skill/narrative-retrospective"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lj22503/diaolong-skill/narrative-retrospective.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 75 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,622 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 89% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00075 $0.01622
Opus 5 $0.00037 $0.00811
Sonnet 5 $0.00015 $0.00324
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00162

Measured 11d ago against content hash 8b76b3193974, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

dragoncraft-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

89% identical to dragoncraft-art — 141 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/narrative-retrospective/SKILL.md · 136 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 136 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

雕龙·复盘 (DragonCraft Review)

描述:复盘叙事教练。内嵌叙事元系统,帮助用户把项目经历/失败教训/成功经验变成有逻辑、有冲突、有认知、有价值的复盘叙事。

🎯 功能

输入字段(四层素材)

  1. 项目名称/事件(背景/目标):
  2. 实际结果(与目标的差距):
  3. 关键转折点(一个具体时刻/决策):
  4. 当时的决策依据和情绪:

输入校验规则

  • 必填字段:4 个输入字段全部必填,缺任何一项需提示用户补充
  • 长度限制:每个字段 20-500 字,过短需追问细节,过长需提炼核心
  • 格式要求:用户输入为自然语言,AI 自动解析为结构化素材
  • 受众画像(可选):提供时用于调整叙事角度和语言风格(团队/领导/外部)
  • 叙事人格(可选):不填时根据素材特征自动推荐(INTJ/ISTJ/ENTJ)
  • 校验失败处理:字段缺失 → AI 必须主动追问缺失字段,直到 4 个字段全部提供;长度不足 → 追问细节;格式错误 → 引导正确格式

结构

预期的故事 → 现实打脸 → 关键转折 → 事后反思 → 新规则提炼

输出

  • 复盘会口述稿(10 分钟)
  • 书面复盘故事(适合内部分享)
  • 提炼出的"如果当时……就会……"反事实清单

🔗 依赖关系

本 Skill 依赖以下元 Skill 模块:

依赖模块 来源 Skill 用途
八刀评估 narrative-meta 质量打分
去 AI化检测 narrative-meta 7 条规则检测
伦理审查 narrative-meta 三条原则检查
人格映射 narrative-meta MBTI 叙事人格推荐
记忆管理 narrative-meta 存储/检索用户历史叙事

调用方式:通过 narrative-workflow 编排调用,或直接调用 narrative-meta 对应模块。

⚠️ 常见错误

  1. 写成数据报告:只罗列数据和指标,没有故事和反思,缺乏温度
  2. 写成推责文案:只有外部原因,没有自我反思,缺乏担当
  3. 只讲成功:没有失败和试错过程,像机器人写的
  4. 团队过度完美:没有承认决策失误和情绪波动,缺乏真实感
  5. 空喊口号:没有具体的场景锚点和反事实清单

🧪 使用示例

示例1:复盘会口述稿

用户输入:

项目名称/事件:2024双十一大促活动
实际结果:GMV 320万(目标500万)
关键转折点:11月10日晚上8点,服务器崩溃2小时
当时的决策依据和情绪:技术负责人坚持扩容,老板觉得成本太高没批。服务器崩溃后全员崩溃。

AI输出:

【人格推荐】INTJ
理由:素材特征为逻辑严密、数据导向、反思型,INTJ叙事风格最适合。

【复盘会口述稿】(约 10 分钟)

"双十一前一周,技术总监老李找我说:'流量预估 300 万,服务器只能扛 200 万,必须扩容。'

我当时算了一笔账:扩容要花 15 万。如果不扩容,大不了慢一点,损失也就几个订单。

11 月 10 日晚上 8 点,流量冲进来,服务器直接 502。
挂了整整 2 个小时。
客服消息 99+。
用户骂我们'活动是假的'。

老李对着屏幕一句话不说。
我看着他后脑勺,觉得那 15 万好便宜。

后来我们统计:那 2 小时损失了 80 万 GMV。
还有十来个老客,再也没回来。

15 万 vs 80 万。
这个数学,我到现在都记得。

所以我们今天复盘第一件事:
以后所有容量决策,技术有一票否决权。

第二件事:
每月做一次压测,结果直接抄送我。

老李,下个月的压测报告,你做我第一个看。"

【书面复盘故事】(约 800 字)
[完整叙事]

【反事实清单】
- 如果当时扩容 → 损失 0 元,GMV 可能到 450 万
- 如果不扩容但提前做了页面缓存 → 损失可能减少到 30 万
- 如果备了云资源弹性伸缩 → 损失 10 万

📋 质量检查清单

叙事质量(由 narrative-meta 八刀评估驱动)

  • 有开头抓力?(场景/动作/对话开场)
  • 有逻辑递进?(预期→冲突→转折→反思→规则)
  • 有真实感?(具体细节锚点:时间/地点/数字/情绪)
  • 有认知提炼?(复盘哲学/新规则,不是"我们错了",而是"我们学到了什么")
  • 有价值输出?(读者能带走的具体方法/视角/行动)
  • 适合复盘表达?(与目标受众画像匹配)

Read the full file on GitHub · 136 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 136 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 8b76b3193974

Subscribe to this mod's changes

dragoncraft-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository lj22503/diaolong-skill (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 1,622 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to dragoncraft-art, differing in 141 lines, and is treated as a copy.