Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ljucask/pureinn-product-development --skill pm-project-chartergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ljucask/pureinn-product-developmentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ljucask/pureinn-product-development/pm-project-charter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ljucask/pureinn-product-development/pm-project-charter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ljucask/pureinn-product-development/pm-project-charter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ljucask/pureinn-product-development/pm-project-charter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ljucask/pureinn-product-development/pm-project-charter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.02714 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01357 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00543 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00271 |
Grade A, and why
pm-project-charter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 299 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PM - Project Charter
Agent mode (--agent)
Supports --agent: runs autonomously in a subagent, drafts the artifact from existing inputs, and returns a short summary + coverage note.
- No flag → interactive (default); if inputs are heavy, offer agent mode.
--agent→ obey. First check inputs are complete. Anything missing: do NOT invent it - mark[ASSUMED - what/why]in the output and summary. Never hallucinate to fill a gap.- Review required: the artifact contains commitments - after drafting, require the user's review before finalizing; do not close decisions autonomously.
What this skill does
Generates two artifacts:
- Project Charter - 1-page document: Why now, What we're building, Success criteria, Constraints
- Assumptions & Risks Register - Project assumptions and risks with severity assessment
Dependencies
Recommended before running:
pm-stakeholder-map- stakeholder context helps define charter decisions and constraints
Produces artifacts used by:
- All Phase 2 skills - charter defines scope, constraints, target market
pm-team-roster- charter scope informs team needspm-comms-charter- charter timeline informs meeting cadence
Step 0: PREREQ check + current state
What this skill needs: Your knowledge of what you're building - no documents required. If you have research notes, briefs, or specs, include them and the skill will extract relevant context automatically.
If you have nothing written down yet: Proceed directly to Step 1 intake questions. The skill elicits everything it needs through questions.
If a Project Charter already exists: Read it. Evaluate: is it still current? If scope, constraints, and success definition haven't changed, surface this:
A Project Charter already exists. It looks [current / potentially outdated because: X].
Skip this skill and proceed to [next Phase 1 skill / Phase 2]?
Or regenerate / update the charter?
Stakeholder Map check: If a Stakeholder Map exists, cross-reference it for decision authority and constraints - feed into charter generation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 299 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 6505ec111109
pm-project-charter is a skill published in the GitHub repository ljucask/pureinn-product-development (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 2,714 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ddt-baseline-sync
A skill that imports staffing, work-hour, or project-plan spreadsheets and CSV files into a historical project baseline. A baseline is past project data used to improve future work-hour estimates.
chief-operating-officer
Owns execution: how work actually gets done across the organization, including process, program management, capacity, vendors, supply chain, and service delivery. Use this when execution is the problem rather than strategy, to design or fix a process, to resolve cross-functional handoff failures, to plan capacity, to…
customer-success-management
Runs the ongoing relationship with accounts after the sale — segmenting coverage against account value, building a health score that predicts rather than describes, running reviews customers find worth attending, forecasting renewals honestly, and finding expansion that follows usage instead of quota. Use this to…
chief-information-officer
The CIO's remit — running the technology the company works on, service quality, IT spend, and the boundary with product engineering. Use this to set IT priorities, decide what IT owns versus engineering, structure IT spend or an IT roadmap, judge whether to build, buy or outsource, or work out why IT is seen as a cost…
service-desk
Runs the IT service desk — intake, triage, prioritization, escalation, knowledge, and the metrics that improve service rather than distort it. Use this to set up or fix a service desk, design ticket priority and escalation, reduce repeat contacts, structure a knowledge base, or work out why a desk hitting its targets…
chief-content-officer
Runs content as an operation — the production pipeline, editorial calendar, repurposing engine, competitive content intelligence, and audits of what already exists. Use this to build or fix a content production system, plan a calendar, decide how one piece becomes many, rank content ideas by expected impact, or audit…