Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/lodetomasi/claude-code-training-lab/code-reviewnpx skills add lodetomasi/claude-code-training-lab --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lodetomasi/claude-code-training-labWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lodetomasi/claude-code-training-lab/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lodetomasi/claude-code-training-lab/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lodetomasi/claude-code-training-lab/code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00196 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00098 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00039 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 28 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 3998af3e046b
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository lodetomasi/claude-code-training-lab (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 196 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
write-test-plan
Generate a QA/UAT test plan from product specifications and task definitions, covering acceptance testing, integration flows, and exploratory testing. Unit tests are out of scope (handled by write-unit-tests skill).
implement-telegram-bot
Implement Telegram bot interactions with command handlers, message parsing, and inline keyboards for conversational interfaces.
setup-background-job
Set up scheduled background jobs using Quartz.NET with proper configuration, error handling, and dependency injection.
write-unit-tests
Write comprehensive unit tests with proper setup, assertions, and coverage of happy paths, edge cases, and error scenarios.
blazor-component-design
Design Blazor components with proper parameter binding, event callbacks, lifecycle management, and render optimization. Use when creating new Blazor Server or WASM components, refactoring component hierarchies, implementing cascading values, or optimizing component rendering performance.
hedgehog-planning-intake
Use on any core for first-run planning intake — Phase 0 runs the vendored BMAD-METHOD planning shelf, shared by every core, and Phase 1 (mining 04-prd.md into intent records plus the Add-ons/sync-and-remote-entities decision) is full-stack-app's and pwa-app's shared procedure — identical mechanics, a different…