Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/requesting-code-reviewnpx skills add Vimalk0703/shipworthy --skill requesting-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Vimalk0703/shipworthyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/requesting-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/requesting-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00389 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00195 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
requesting-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Requesting Code Review
When to Request
- After completing all tasks in a plan
- Before creating a pull request
- After significant refactoring
- When unsure about an approach
How to Request
1. Determine the Review Scope
Use git to identify what changed:
git diff main...HEAD --stat # files changed
git log main..HEAD --oneline # commits to review
2. Dispatch the Code Reviewer Agent
Launch the code-reviewer agent with:
- The commit range or diff to review
- The architecture.md constraints
- The original plan/spec (if applicable)
- Specific concerns you want addressed
3. Review Checklist
The code reviewer evaluates:
- Plan alignment — does the code match the spec?
- Architecture compliance — does it follow Mandatory Rules?
- Code quality — naming, structure, readability
- Error handling — proper patterns, no silent failures
- Security — input validation, auth checks, no secrets
- Testing — coverage, meaningful assertions, edge cases
- Performance — no obvious bottlenecks, proper queries
- Type safety — no
any, proper types, null handling
4. Issue Severity
Issues are flagged as:
- Critical — must fix before merge (bugs, security issues, broken tests)
- Important — should fix (architecture violations, missing tests)
- Suggestion — nice to have (naming improvements, refactoring ideas)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 52 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 532da3cd2b5f
requesting-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Vimalk0703/shipworthy (7 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 389 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
hedgehog-planning-intake
Use on any core for first-run planning intake — Phase 0 runs the vendored BMAD-METHOD planning shelf, shared by every core, and Phase 1 (mining 04-prd.md into intent records plus the Add-ons/sync-and-remote-entities decision) is full-stack-app's and pwa-app's shared procedure — identical mechanics, a different…
inbound-triage
Maintainer-only. Use when triaging inbound GitHub issues and pull requests on skyf0xx/hedgehog — "triage the issues", "check the PRs", "review inbound", "what's in the queue". Reads each item read-only, judges it for security and for whether it is real, then fixes and closes or comments and closes. Not part of the…
bmad-product-brief
Create, update, or validate a product brief. Use when the user wants help producing, editing, or validating a brief.
bmad-revendor
Maintainer-only. Use when re-vendoring vendor-skills/BMAD/ against a newer BMAD-METHOD commit — "update BMAD", "re-vendor BMAD", "bump the BMAD pin". Not part of the Hedgehog discipline a consuming project copies; this only applies to the Hedgehog repo itself.
bmad-deep-recon
Decision-grade research, three ways: draft a deep-research prompt for the user to run in their own tool (ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, …), process a finished research report — file it, distill a succinct cited summary with metadata that downstream skills consume without reprocessing — or run the research here…
conventional-commits
Use when uncommitted changes need to be split into atomic, conventional commits ordered for review. Triggers on "commit this", "make commits", "clean up commits", "commit the changes". In Hedgehog, each Loop step is already meant to be its own commit — this skill matters most when a Correction Protocol fast-forward…