ic-sim

IC Simulation Skill

Help startup founders prepare for the conversation that happens behind closed doors — the one where VC partners debate whether to invest. Produce a realistic IC simulation with three distinct partner perspectives, scored across 28 dimensions, with specific coaching on what to prepare. The tone is founder-first: a coaching tool for preparation, not a judgment.

Skill Metadata

• Author: lool-ventures
• Version: managed in founder-skills/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
• Compatibility: Python 3.10+ and uv for script execution.
• Imports (recommended):
  • market-sizing:sizing.json — fund alignment and market validation
  • deck-review:checklist.json — deck quality assessment
• Exports:
  • report.json → fundraise-readiness, dd-readiness

Skill Execution Model (READ FIRST)

See founder-skills/references/skill-execution-model.md for the full inline-skill execution model (3 dispatch contexts, Mitigation 1+2, producer contract, Cowork quirks, per-symptom triage).

This skill runs inline in the main thread, not as a sub-agent — see the reference above ("Why Inline (Not Forked Sub-Agent)") for the rationale. Sub-agents are deliberately shell-free, so orchestration (producer scripts, artifact persistence) stays in the main thread.

Two dispatch contexts for the sub-agent:

• Context A — Per-step analytical dispatch (Mitigation 1): Steps 5, 6, 6b, and 8 dispatch the ic-sim agent via the Task tool. The novel element here is parallel dispatch: Step 6 (PARTNER_ANALYSIS) and Step 6b (PARTNER_REBUTTAL) each dispatch the agent three times simultaneously — one per partner archetype — in a single assistant turn. Step 5 (DETECT_CONFLICTS) and Step 8 (SCORE_DIMENSIONS) are sequential dispatches. The sub-agent does deep analysis, WRITES its output JSON to the OUTPUT_PATH given in its prompt (the handoff/ dir), and returns a small receipt. The main thread gates the file with check_handoff.py, then pipes it through the producer script. The sub-agent never writes canonical artifacts — only its hand-off file. Step 6b is the real second debate round: each archetype sees the other two's round-1 assessments and either holds its position or moves on stated evidence; Step 7's compose_discussion.py then derives discussion.json from Steps 6 and 6b's six artifacts — never authored by the main thread.
• Context B — Post-compose coaching dispatch: The final step dispatches the sub-agent after compose_report.py writes report.md. The sub-agent Reads the staged coaching_payload.json from the hand-off dir (Mitigation 2) — it does NOT read the full report.md — composes the coaching commentary, WRITES it to the OUTPUT_PATH hand-off file, and returns a small receipt. The main thread gates the file (check_handoff.py) and inserts it via the shared insert_coaching.py script (idempotency matrix, uuid-marker replacement, run_id-parity verification — all deterministic). See the reference above for the full Context B contract.