Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/lorem-dev/skillkeeper-test-repo/invalid-strictnpx skills add lorem-dev/skillkeeper-test-repo --skill invalid-strictgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lorem-dev/skillkeeper-test-repoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lorem-dev/skillkeeper-test-repo/invalid-strict)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lorem-dev/skillkeeper-test-repo/invalid-strict"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lorem-dev/skillkeeper-test-repo/invalid-strict.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00403 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00201 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
invalid-strict scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
invalid-strict
This skill is expected to fail resolution. It is a negative fixture, and
the second of the two in this repository - the other is
deep-nesting/l2/l3/l4/too-deep-skill.
skillkeeper.requires is a scalar where a list of strings is required. The
namespaced block is the strict half of the two spellings: a malformed value
there is refused rather than coerced, and refusing it means the whole manifest
fails to parse, so the skill does not resolve.
Contrast the flat field, which is lenient: requires: oops at the top level
would be read as a one-element list, and an unusable entry would be dropped
with a note while the skill survived. Strictness is the point of the
namespaced block, and this fixture is what pins it.
Expected behaviour
The resolver reports one warning naming this manifest:
Skipping invalid requires/invalid-strict/SKILL.md: "skillkeeper.requires" must
be a list of strings
repo lint reclassifies it as SK003, an error, with no skill path -
there is no resolved skill to attribute it to:
SK003: Skipping invalid requires/invalid-strict/SKILL.md:
"skillkeeper.requires" must be a list of strings
Because this skill never resolves, skillkeeper skill install invalid-strict
fails with Skill not found in any tracked repository, and it is absent from
skill list output for the repository. Nothing else in the requires group
references it, so no other skill reports an SK001 on its account.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 47 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 76ae6d628a3e
invalid-strict is a skill published in the GitHub repository lorem-dev/skillkeeper-test-repo (2 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 403 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
happiness-skill
当用户问「怎么才能更幸福/为什么得到了还不满足/怎么减少焦虑」时调用。 核心理念: 幸福是缺憾感清空的默认状态, 是可训练的技能; 欲望是与自己的契约(得到前不快乐), 同时只留一个重大欲望; 活在当下。 不适用于: 临床抑郁等需要专业治疗的场景(本书方法不能替代医疗)。 Triggers: 幸福/不快乐/欲望/焦虑/知足/活在当下/happiness/desire/anxiety.
docx-comment-reply
Reply to comments (批注) in Word .docx/.doc files: extract comment context, draft replies, write threaded replies back, and validate OOXML.
explaining-machine-learning-models
Explain trained machine learning models through feature attribution, local explanations, and behavior summaries. Use as an explicit/manual helper once a model already exists, not for training ownership, leakage auditing, or general ML strategy selection.
influence-psychology
Apply the seven principles of ethical persuasion (reciprocity, commitment, social proof, authority, liking, scarcity, unity) to product design, copy, and sales. Use when the user mentions "social proof", "persuasive copy", "why users dont convert", "ethical persuasion", "reciprocity", "scarcity tactics", "commitment…
jobs-to-be-done
Discover what customers truly need by analyzing the "job" they hire your product to do. Use when the user mentions "customer discovery", "why customers churn", "what job does this solve", "competing against luck", "product-market fit", "switching behavior", "milkshake moment", or "functional vs emotional jobs". Also…
refactoring-ui
Audit and fix visual hierarchy, spacing, color, and depth in web UIs. Use when the user mentions "my UI looks off" (or amateur/unprofessional), "fix the design", "Tailwind styling", "color palette", "visual hierarchy", "design system", "spacing scale", or "component styling". Also trigger when building consistent…