Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lovstudio/skills --skill gh-contributegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lovstudio/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lovstudio/skills/gh-contribute)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lovstudio/skills/gh-contribute"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lovstudio/skills/gh-contribute.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 41 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00102 | $0.02210 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.01105 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00442 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00221 |
Grade A, and why
lov-gh-contribute scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 251 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
开源贡献助手 · Open Source Contributor
Turn local changes into a clean, professional pull request against an upstream repo you don't own. Handles the full fork → branch → commit → push → PR pipeline, and splits work into multiple PRs when the changes span unrelated concerns.
When to Use
- User wants to contribute to an open-source project they don't have write access to
- User already has local edits and needs them shipped as a PR upstream
- User asks to "fork this repo and send a PR"
- User has mixed changes (e.g. docs + feature + refactor) and wants them split properly
Non-Goals
- Does not write code changes — assumes the user (or a prior step) already has the desired modifications in the working tree or in their head
- Does not review the project's own PRs (see
gh-tidy) - Does not mirror to GitLab/Gitea — GitHub only
Workflow (MANDATORY)
Execute steps in order. Do not skip confirmations.
Step 1: Identify the target repo
Determine the upstream owner/repo:
- If the user pasted a URL or
owner/repostring → use it - Otherwise run
git remote -vin the current directory and pick theorigin(if origin is already the user's fork, find the upstream viagh repo view --json parent)
Record three facts:
UPSTREAM— e.g.ZenMux/zenmux-docDEFAULT_BRANCH— fromgh repo view $UPSTREAM --json defaultBranchRef -q .defaultBranchRef.nameUSER_LOGIN— fromgh api user -q .login
Step 2: Read the contribution rules
Fetch CONTRIBUTING.md and CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md from upstream (if present) and
skim for: commit message format, DCO/CLA requirements, branch naming, PR template.
Carry these constraints into subsequent steps.
gh api repos/$UPSTREAM/contents/CONTRIBUTING.md -q .content 2>/dev/null | base64 -d
If the repo has .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md, use it as the PR body skeleton.
Step 3: Survey the changes
Gather the change set that needs to become PR(s):
git status --porcelain
git diff --stat $DEFAULT_BRANCH...HEAD # committed
git diff --stat # unstaged
git diff --stat --cached # staged
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed 19e6f3e9f1c2
- 8d ago First seen · 251 lines · 102 tokens per session scan A 372046e7b105
lov-gh-contribute is a skill published in the GitHub repository lovstudio/skills (64 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 102 tokens to every session and 2,210 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-pr
This skill should be used when user asks to "create a PR", "make a pull request", "open PR for this branch", "submit changes as PR", "push and create PR", or explicitly invokes "create-pr".
commit-staged
This skill should be used when user asks to "commit these changes", "write commit message", "stage and commit", "create a commit", "commit staged files", or explicitly invokes "commit-staged".
resolve-pr-comments
This skill should be used when user asks to "address PR comments", "resolve PR feedback", "handle review comments", "fix PR issues", "respond to PR review", or explicitly invokes "resolve-pr-comments".
review-pr
This skill should be used when user asks to "review a PR", "review pull request", "review this pr", "code review this PR", "check PR.
update-pr-summary
This skill should be used when user asks to "update PR summary", "update PR description", "rewrite PR body", "refresh PR title and body", or explicitly invokes "update-pr-summary".
clean-gone-branches
This skill should be used when user asks to "clean gone branches", "remove deleted local branches", "prune branches removed from remote", or explicitly invokes "clean-gone-branches".